2,216
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1:
Line 8:
Line 8:
Line 23:
Line 22:
Line 32:
Line 30:
</br>
no edit summary
{{TOClimit|2}}
{{TOClimit|3}}
*Woodside SmartCentre (Markham)
*Woodside SmartCentre (Markham)
*North Queen Street & The Queensway (Etobicoke)
*North Queen Street & The Queensway (Etobicoke)
The mean performance value recorded at the inlet for OGS practices' ability to remove Total Suspended Sediments (TSS) was was calculated based on 46 separate recordings between 1997 - 1998 amongst the two sites previously mentioned.
The mean performance value recorded at the inlet for OGS practices' ability to remove Total Suspended Sediments (TSS) was was calculated based on 46 separate recordings between 1997 - 1998 amongst the two sites previously mentioned.
*Woodside SmartCentre (Markham)
*Woodside SmartCentre (Markham)
*North Queen Street & The Queensway (Etobicoke)
*North Queen Street & The Queensway (Etobicoke)
The mean performance value recorded at the inlet for OGS practices' ability to remove Total Suspended Sediments (TSS) was was calculated based on 46 separate recordings between 1997 - 1998 amongst the two sites previously mentioned.
The mean performance value recorded at the inlet for OGS practices' ability to remove Total Suspended Sediments (TSS) was was calculated based on 46 separate recordings between 1997 - 1998 amongst the two sites previously mentioned.
<br>
<br>
'''Refer to the [[Oil and Grit Separator]] page for more information related to updated requirements through laboratory testing in accordance with the [https://etvcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ETV-OGS-Procedure_final_revised-June_2014.pdf Procedure for Laboratory Testing of Oil-Grit Separators PDF (TRCA/CETV Program)] testing protocol and will have current and valid [https://etvcanada.ca/home/verify-your-technology/current-verified-technologies/ ISO14034: Environmental Technology Verification (ETV) program].
'''Refer to the [[Oil and Grit Separator]] page for more information related to updated requirements through laboratory testing in accordance with the [https://etvcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/ETV-OGS-Procedure_final_revised-June_2014.pdf Procedure for Laboratory Testing of Oil-Grit Separators PDF (TRCA/CETV Program)] testing protocol and will have current and valid [https://etvcanada.ca/home/verify-your-technology/current-verified-technologies/ ISO14034: Environmental Technology Verification (ETV) program].
==Recent Performance Research==
==Recent Performance Research==
[[File:OGS types Lee, 2014 update.PNG|thumb|400px|Shown here are the two variations of hydrodynamic separators ([[Oil and grit separator]]s) used in the 6-year study conducted by Lee, et al., 2014. All four OGS' used were of different sizes. The first (Type A) was a dip cylindrical plate with a centershaft and the second (Type B) was a hollow cylindrical screen. All four sites where the OGS' were installed were in urban settings in Gyunggi Province, Korea, and discharge into Gyung-An stream, which deposits into the Pal-dang Lake. This lake is the the primary drinking water source for Seoul's Metropolitan area (Lee, et al. 2014<ref>Lee, D.H., Min, K.S. and Kang, J.H., 2014. Performance evaluation and a sizing method for hydrodynamic separators treating urban stormwater runoff. Water science and technology, 69(10), pp.2122-2131)</ref>.]]
*[https://www.conteches.com/Portals/0/Documents/Product%20Evaluation%20and%20%20Testing/vx_harding_township.pdf?ver=2018-05-31-143332-863 (Greenway, 2001) - Stormwater Treatment Demonstration Project - Oil water/grit separator followed by a sand filter.]
*[https://www.conteches.com/Portals/0/Documents/Product%20Evaluation%20and%20%20Testing/vx_harding_township.pdf?ver=2018-05-31-143332-863 (Greenway, 2001) - Stormwater Treatment Demonstration Project - Oil water/grit separator followed by a sand filter.]
**This project took place for Harding Township in New Jersey back in 2001. The performance assessment showcased the ability of a Vortechnics Oil/Grit separator followed by a sand filter's removal ability over three years located at a rest stop off a nearby highway. A full storm analysis was conducted over the three-year project and found that the average TSS (mg/L) entering the Oil/Grit separator was 492 mg/L whereas the outlet of the separator had only 35.18 mg/L of TSS remaining (a ~93% reduction rate). Once water passed through the sand filter after the OGS, the removal efficiency increased to 98.12%, with only 9.28 mg/L of TSS remaining (Greenway, 2001<ref>Greenway, R.A. 2001. Stormwater Treatment Demonstration Project—Oil water/grit separator followed by a sand filter: RTP Environmental Associates. Inc., prepared for Harding Township, NJ, Environmental Commission and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Paper WM-668. https://www.conteches.com/Portals/0/Documents/Product%20Evaluation%20and%20%20Testing/vx_harding_township.pdf?ver=2018-05-31-143332-863</ref>).
**This project took place for Harding Township in New Jersey back in 2001. The performance assessment showcased the ability of a Vortechnics Oil/Grit separator followed by a sand filter's removal ability over three years located at a rest stop off a nearby highway. A full storm analysis was conducted over the three-year project and found that the average TSS (mg/L) entering the Oil/Grit separator was 492 mg/L whereas the outlet of the separator had only 35.18 mg/L of TSS remaining (a ~93% reduction rate). Once water passed through the sand filter after the OGS, the removal efficiency increased to 98.12%, with only 9.28 mg/L of TSS remaining (Greenway, 2001<ref>Greenway, R.A. 2001. Stormwater Treatment Demonstration Project—Oil water/grit separator followed by a sand filter: RTP Environmental Associates. Inc., prepared for Harding Township, NJ, Environmental Commission and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Paper WM-668. https://www.conteches.com/Portals/0/Documents/Product%20Evaluation%20and%20%20Testing/vx_harding_township.pdf?ver=2018-05-31-143332-863</ref>).
*[https://www.eeer.org/upload/eer-14-4-262-.pdf (Jianghua, et al. 2009) - Performance Analysis of a Hydrodynamic Separator for Treating Particulate Pollutants in Highway Rainfall Runoff.]
*[https://www.eeer.org/upload/eer-14-4-262-.pdf (Jianghua, et al. 2009) - Performance Analysis of a Hydrodynamic Separator for Treating Particulate Pollutants in Highway Rainfall Runoff.]
** This study examined the separation characteristics of particles in runoff from paved roads using a OGS hydro cyclone design. The results indicated the TSS concentration ratio between the overflow and inflow (TSSover/in) decreased as a function of the operational pressure and the particle removal efficiency was mainly affected by the particle size. By using highway runoff results showed that removal efficiency was greater than 60%. The TSSover/in was (0.26 mg/L – 0.41 mg/L) below the Canadian Water Quality Guidelines (CWQGs) (Jianghua, et al. 2009<ref>Jianghua, Y., Qitao, Y. and Kim, Y. 2009. Performance analysis of a hydrodynamic separator for treating particulate pollutants in highway rainfall runoff. Environmental Engineering Research, 14(4), pp.262-269. https://www.eeer.org/upload/eer-14-4-262-.pdf</ref>).
** This study examined the separation characteristics of particles in runoff from paved roads using a OGS hydro cyclone design. The results indicated the TSS concentration ratio between the overflow and inflow (TSSover/in) decreased as a function of the operational pressure and the particle removal efficiency was mainly affected by the particle size. By using highway runoff results showed that removal efficiency was greater than 60%. The TSSover/in was (0.26 mg/L – 0.41 mg/L) below the Canadian Water Quality Guidelines (CWQGs) (Jianghua, et al. 2009<ref>Jianghua, Y., Qitao, Y. and Kim, Y. 2009. Performance analysis of a hydrodynamic separator for treating particulate pollutants in highway rainfall runoff. Environmental Engineering Research, 14(4), pp.262-269. https://www.eeer.org/upload/eer-14-4-262-.pdf</ref>).
*[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24845330/ (Lee, et al. 2014) - Performance evaluation and a sizing method for hydrodynamic separators treating urban stormwater runoff.]
*[https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24845330/ (Lee, et al. 2014) - Performance evaluation and a sizing method for hydrodynamic separators treating urban stormwater runoff.]
**This study conducted performance monitoring over a 6-year period (137 separate storm events) of four different hydrodynamic separators in Korean urban catchments between 2006 - 2012. Removal rates were relatively low at all four sites (1. Roadway site: Avg. Inflow = 239.32 mg/L vs Avg. Outflow = 122.2- mg/L / 2. Residential site: Avg. Inflow = 59.74 mg/L vs Avg. Outflow = 50.35 mg/L / 3. Roadway Site: Avg. Inflow = 62.50 mg/L vs. Avg. Outflow = 33.76 mg/L / 4. Residential(63.5%) & Roadway (36.5%) CDA site: Avg. Inflow = 236.24 mg/L vs. Avg. Outflow = 160.54 mg/L). The low removal rates were due to high rates of extreme overflow events occurring with most suspended sediment being quite small/fine in nature (<75μm)(Lee, et al. 2014<ref>Lee, D.H., Min, K.S. and Kang, J.H., 2014. Performance evaluation and a sizing method for hydrodynamic separators treating urban stormwater runoff. Water science and technology, 69(10), pp.2122-2131).
**This study conducted performance monitoring over a 6-year period (137 separate storm events) of four different hydrodynamic separators in Korean urban catchments between 2006 - 2012. Removal rates were relatively low at all four sites (1. Roadway site: Avg. Inflow = 239.32 mg/L vs Avg. Outflow = 122.2- mg/L / 2. Residential site: Avg. Inflow = 59.74 mg/L vs Avg. Outflow = 50.35 mg/L / 3. Roadway Site: Avg. Inflow = 62.50 mg/L vs. Avg. Outflow = 33.76 mg/L / 4. Residential(63.5%) & Roadway (36.5%) CDA site: Avg. Inflow = 236.24 mg/L vs. Avg. Outflow = 160.54 mg/L). The low removal rates were due to high rates of extreme overflow events occurring with most suspended sediment being quite small/fine in nature (<75μm)(Lee, et al. 2014<ref>Lee, D.H., Min, K.S. and Kang, J.H., 2014. Performance evaluation and a sizing method for hydrodynamic separators treating urban stormwater runoff. Water science and technology, 69(10), pp.2122-2131)</ref>.
==References==
==References==