Difference between revisions of "Design verification and site walk-through"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Kyle menken (talk | contribs) Tag: Manual revert |
Kyle menken (talk | contribs) m |
||
(12 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
When the design is 90% complete, the project manager (PM) should conduct a walk-through of the site to verify that the designs match site conditions. This site walk-through is a critical step in the transition from design to construction and helps the project manager plan for future pre-bid or pre-construction meetings. Think carefully about how a contractor will be able to build the LID practice. At this stage, determine if the design drawings and construction notes address specific LID construction requirements, and determine whether they contain inaccuracies or are missing detail. The table below identifies details key points and considerations for the walk-through. | |||
When the design is 90 % complete, the project manager (PM) should conduct a walk-through of the site to verify that the designs match site conditions. This site walk-through is a critical step in the transition from design to construction and helps the project manager plan for future pre-bid or pre-construction meetings. | |||
{|class="wikitable" | {|class="wikitable" | ||
Line 9: | Line 7: | ||
!Key considerations | !Key considerations | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Adjacent land uses|| | |Adjacent land uses|| | ||
*Have land uses changed while the design was in progress? Are there any planned land-use changes on adjacent properties and is their drainage connected to the site? | |||
*Will adjacent land uses create dirty runoff that may flow onto the construction site or into the LID feature? | |||
*Is additional erosion and sediment control (ESC) measures required beyond what is marked in the ESC plan? | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Contributing and receiving drainage areas|| | |Contributing and receiving drainage areas|| | ||
*Where is water coming onto the site and where is water leaving the site? | |||
*Are any environmentally sensitive areas downstream? | |||
*Are there any apparent changes while the design was in progress? If so, should these changes motivate modifications to the design, particular ESC measures, etc.? | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Seasonal maintenance operations|| | |||
|Seasonal maintenance operations|| | *Will [[winter]] snow storage and [[salt]] or sand application impact the LID feature? | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Location of LID features|| | |||
|Location of LID features|| | *Do the proposed LID locations match the site? | ||
*Does the footprint of the LID fit within the site's constraints? | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Existing and planned infrastructure/utilities|| | |||
|Existing and planned infrastructure/utilities|| | *Confirm accuracy of design drawings. | ||
*Are there any unmarked utilities not detailed within the drawing set? | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Property boundaries and building foundations|| | |||
|Property boundaries and building foundations|| | *Confirm accuracy of design drawings. | ||
*Do fence lines align with property boundaries? | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Natural heritage features and existing vegetation || | |||
|Natural heritage features and existing vegetation || | *Do the designs accurately capture existing natural heritage features? Which areas on the site should be protected during construction, and will these exclusion areas make the LID facility more difficult to construct? Where are the drip lines of the site's trees? | ||
*Are there any invasive species on the site which could colonize the LID practice? | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Access, sequencing, staging, and constructability || | |Access, sequencing, staging, and constructability || | ||
*Where will the contractor access the site? | |||
*What is the ideal construction sequence, and where could materials and supplies be stored during construction? | |||
*Do site characteristics constrain standard construction practices? Will it be a difficult job? | |||
*Do constructability issues require a field change or amendment to the design or project tender? | |||
|} | |} |
Latest revision as of 14:03, 10 August 2022
When the design is 90% complete, the project manager (PM) should conduct a walk-through of the site to verify that the designs match site conditions. This site walk-through is a critical step in the transition from design to construction and helps the project manager plan for future pre-bid or pre-construction meetings. Think carefully about how a contractor will be able to build the LID practice. At this stage, determine if the design drawings and construction notes address specific LID construction requirements, and determine whether they contain inaccuracies or are missing detail. The table below identifies details key points and considerations for the walk-through.
Verification point | Key considerations |
---|---|
Adjacent land uses |
|
Contributing and receiving drainage areas |
|
Seasonal maintenance operations | |
Location of LID features |
|
Existing and planned infrastructure/utilities |
|
Property boundaries and building foundations |
|
Natural heritage features and existing vegetation |
|
Access, sequencing, staging, and constructability |
|