Difference between revisions of "Bioretention: Performance"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Jenny Hill (talk | contribs) m |
Jenny Hill (talk | contribs) m |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{|class="wikitable sortable" | {|class="wikitable sortable" | ||
|+ Performance of bioretention with internal water storage<ref>Liu J, Sample D, Bell C, Guan Y. Review and Research Needs of Bioretention Used for the Treatment of Urban Stormwater. Water. 2014;6(4):1069-1099. doi:10.3390/w6041069.</ref> | |+ Performance of bioretention with internal water storage<ref>Liu J, Sample D, Bell C, Guan Y. Review and Research Needs of Bioretention Used for the Treatment of Urban Stormwater. Water. 2014;6(4):1069-1099. doi:10.3390/w6041069.</ref> | ||
|- | |- | ||
!style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|Location | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|Location | ||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
|} | |} | ||
== | ===For review=== | ||
*http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29EE.1943-7870.0000876 (pollutants) | *http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29EE.1943-7870.0000876 (pollutants) | ||
*http://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/9780784413883.003 (maturation) | *http://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/9780784413883.003 (maturation) | ||
| Line 53: | Line 50: | ||
*https://www.unh.edu/unhsc/sites/unh.edu.unhsc/files/STONE%20THESIS%20FINAL.pdf (modified biomedia) | *https://www.unh.edu/unhsc/sites/unh.edu.unhsc/files/STONE%20THESIS%20FINAL.pdf (modified biomedia) | ||
*http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/5/1/13/htm (cold climate) | *http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/5/1/13/htm (cold climate) | ||
---- | |||
[[Category: Performance]] | |||
Latest revision as of 01:17, 9 March 2018
STEP are conducting a review of performance for many BMP types throughout 2018. This content will be updated shortly.
| Location | Filter media composition | Media depth (cm) | Internal water storage depth (cm) | I/P ratio | Runoff volume reduction (%) | TSS reduction (%) | TN reduction (%) | TP reduction (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Montréal[2] | 88% sand, 8% fines, 4% OM | 180 | 150 | 47 | 97 | 99 | 99 | 99 |
| Virginia[3] | 88% sand, 8% fines, 4% OM | 180 | 150 | 47 | 97 | 99 | 99 | 99 |
| North Carolina[4] | 96% sand, 4% fines | 110 | 88 | 12 | 89 | 58 | 58 | -10 |
| 58 | 93 | |||||||
| 96 | 72 | 13 | 98 | |||||
| 42 | 100 | |||||||
| North Carolina[5] | loamy sand, 3% OM | 120 | 60 | 20 | 99 | - | - | - |
| North Carolina[6] | 98% sand, 2% fines | 90 | 30 | 12 | 90 | - | - | - |
| 90 | 60 | 12 | 98 | - | - | - | ||
| North Carolina[7] | 15% sand, 80% fines, 5% OM | 60 | 45 | 68 | - | - | 54 | 63 |
| 90 | 75 | 68 | - | - | 54 | 58 |
For review[edit]
- http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29EE.1943-7870.0000876 (pollutants)
- http://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/9780784413883.003 (maturation)
- https://www1.villanova.edu/content/dam/villanova/engineering/vcase/sym-presentations/2011/40_2ayers.pdf (maturation)
- https://www.chijournal.org/C417 (undersized)
- https://www.unh.edu/unhsc/sites/unh.edu.unhsc/files/STONE%20THESIS%20FINAL.pdf (modified biomedia)
- http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/5/1/13/htm (cold climate)
- ↑ Liu J, Sample D, Bell C, Guan Y. Review and Research Needs of Bioretention Used for the Treatment of Urban Stormwater. Water. 2014;6(4):1069-1099. doi:10.3390/w6041069.
- ↑ Géhéniau N, Fuamba M, Mahaut V, Gendron MR, Dugué M. Monitoring of a Rain Garden in Cold Climate: Case Study of a Parking Lot near Montréal. J Irrig Drain Eng. 2015;141(6):4014073. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000836.
- ↑ DeBusk KM, Wynn TM. Storm-Water Bioretention for Runoff Quality and Quantity Mitigation. J Environ Eng. 2011;137(9):800-808. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000388.
- ↑ Brown RA, Asce AM, Hunt WF, Asce M. Underdrain Configuration to Enhance Bioretention Exfiltration to Reduce Pollutant Loads. J Environ Eng. 2011;137(11):1082-1091. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000437.
- ↑ Li H, Sharkey LJ, Hunt WF, Davis AP. Mitigation of Impervious Surface Hydrology Using Bioretention in North Carolina and Maryland. J Hydrol Eng. 2009;14(4):407-415. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2009)14:4(407).
- ↑ Brown RA, Hunt WF. Bioretention Performance in the Upper Coastal Plain of North Carolina. In: Low Impact Development for Urban Ecosystem and Habitat Protection. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2008:1-10. doi:10.1061/41009(333)95.
- ↑ Passeport E, Hunt WF, Line DE, Smith RA, Brown RA. Field Study of the Ability of Two Grassed Bioretention Cells to Reduce Storm-Water Runoff Pollution. J Irrig Drain Eng. 2009;135(4):505-510. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000006.