Difference between revisions of "Bioswales: Performance"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Jenny Hill (talk | contribs) (Created page with "<p>While few field studies of the pollutant removal capacity of bioswales are available from cold climate regions like Ontario, it can be assumed that they would perform simil...") |
Jenny Hill (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<p>While few field studies of the pollutant removal capacity of bioswales are available from cold climate regions like Ontario, it can be assumed that they would perform similar to [[bioretention cells]]. Bioretention provides effective removal for many pollutants as a result of sedimentation, filtering, plant uptake, soil adsorption, and microbial processes. It is important to note that there is a relationship between the water balance and water quality functions. If a bioswale infiltrates and evaporates 100% of the flow from a site, then there is essentially no pollution leaving the site in surface runoff. Furthermore, treatment of infiltrated runoff will continue to occur as it moves through the native soils. </p> | <p>While few field studies of the pollutant removal capacity of bioswales are available from cold climate regions like Ontario, it can be assumed that they would perform similar to [[bioretention cells]]. Bioretention provides effective removal for many pollutants as a result of sedimentation, filtering, plant uptake, soil adsorption, and microbial processes. It is important to note that there is a relationship between the water balance and water quality functions. If a bioswale infiltrates and evaporates 100% of the flow from a site, then there is essentially no pollution leaving the site in surface runoff. Furthermore, treatment of infiltrated runoff will continue to occur as it moves through the native soils. </p> | ||
<table table class="table table-condensed table-striped" | <table table class="table table-condensed table-striped"> | ||
<tr class= | <tr class=success> | ||
<th class="text-center">Design</th> | <th class="text-center">Design</th> | ||
<th class="text-center">Location</th> | <th class="text-center">Location</th> | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td colspan=2 class="text-right">Runoff reduction estimate</td> | <td colspan=2 class="text-right"><strong>Runoff reduction estimate</strong></td> | ||
<td class="text-center">85%</td> | <td class="text-center"><strong>85 %</strong></td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
Revision as of 21:44, 11 July 2017
While few field studies of the pollutant removal capacity of bioswales are available from cold climate regions like Ontario, it can be assumed that they would perform similar to bioretention cells. Bioretention provides effective removal for many pollutants as a result of sedimentation, filtering, plant uptake, soil adsorption, and microbial processes. It is important to note that there is a relationship between the water balance and water quality functions. If a bioswale infiltrates and evaporates 100% of the flow from a site, then there is essentially no pollution leaving the site in surface runoff. Furthermore, treatment of infiltrated runoff will continue to occur as it moves through the native soils.
| Design | Location | Runoff reduction |
|---|---|---|
| No underdrain | Washington | 98 % |
| No underdrain | United Kingdom | 94 % |
| With underdrain | Maryland | 46 - 54 % |
| Runoff reduction estimate | 85 % | |