Difference between revisions of "Bioretention: Performances"
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
*[https://www3.epa.gov/region1/npdes/stormwater/research/epa-final-report-filter-study.pdf USEPA, 2013 - Evaluation and Optimization of Bioretention Design for Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal] | *[https://www3.epa.gov/region1/npdes/stormwater/research/epa-final-report-filter-study.pdf USEPA, 2013 - Evaluation and Optimization of Bioretention Design for Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal] | ||
**USEPA conducted both field and laboratory testing on the performance of bioretention with augmented designs and filter media composition with aluminum hydroxide/oxide content, found normally within water treatment residuals. These additives added at 10-15% of the total filter media mix ad median removal efficiencies of 90-99% of orthophosphate and a second study found a bioretention design with WTR mixture in the filter media and a [[Bioretention: Internal water storage | **USEPA conducted both field and laboratory testing on the performance of bioretention with augmented designs and filter media composition with aluminum hydroxide/oxide content, found normally within water treatment residuals. These additives added at 10-15% of the total filter media mix ad median removal efficiencies of 90-99% of orthophosphate and a second study found a bioretention design with WTR mixture in the filter media and a [[Bioretention: Internal water storage|IWSZ]] optimized to remove phosphorus and nitrogen had a removal efficiency of 20% and effluent concentrations below 20µg/L (well below the MECP/CCME guideline in Ontario). | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 16:28, 31 January 2023
Phosphorus Reduction[edit]
The performance results for Bioretention practices, located within TRCA's watershed originate from three primary sites:
- Kortright Centre
- Earth Rangers
- Seneca College
- Aurora Community Centre
- Central Parkway (Mississauga)
- Wychwood Subdivision (Brampton)
- IMAX Corporation, head office
The mean performance value recorded at the outlet for Bioretention practices' ability to remove Total Phosphorus (TP) was calculated based on 355 separate recordings between 2005-2007, 2011-2019 and 2021 amongst the seven sites previously mentioned.
As can be seen in the corresponding boxplot the mean performance removal efficiency of the bioretention practices monitored are not meeting the acceptable upper extent range of nutrients as of 0.03 mg/L (30 µg/L) (Environment Canada, 2004[1]; OMOEE, 1994[2]).
The median value of the 355 samples taken was 0.87 mg/L whereas the mean was 0.123 mg/L, with an 86% guideline exceedance. Given the age of most of these practices, more inspection, maintenance and necessary rehabilitation will be needed to ensure they are able to meet the federal and provincial governments' guideline requirement for stormwater quality.
TSS Reduction[edit]
The performance results for Bioretention practices, located within TRCA's watershed originate from three primary sites:
- Kortright Centre
- Earth Rangers
- Seneca College
- Central Parkway (Mississauga)
- Wychwood Subdivision (Brampton)
- IMAX Corporation, head office
The mean performance value recorded at the outlet for Bioretention practices' ability to remove Total Suspended Sediments (TSS) was was calculated based on 301 separate recordings between 2005-2007, 2011-2019 and 2021 amongst the six sites previously mentioned.
As can be seen in the corresponding boxplot the mean performance removal efficiency of the bioretention practices monitored are well below the suggested guideline of 30 mg/L (Canadian Water Quality Guideline (CWQG), or (background (assumed at <5 mg/L)+ 25 mg/L for short term (<24 hour) exposure) (CCME, 2002[3]; (TRCA, 2021[4]).
The median value of the 301 samples taken was 9.50 mg/L whereas the mean was 18.63 mg/L, with a 15% guideline exceedance.
External Performance Resources[edit]
- USEPA, 2013 - Evaluation and Optimization of Bioretention Design for Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal
- USEPA conducted both field and laboratory testing on the performance of bioretention with augmented designs and filter media composition with aluminum hydroxide/oxide content, found normally within water treatment residuals. These additives added at 10-15% of the total filter media mix ad median removal efficiencies of 90-99% of orthophosphate and a second study found a bioretention design with WTR mixture in the filter media and a IWSZ optimized to remove phosphorus and nitrogen had a removal efficiency of 20% and effluent concentrations below 20µg/L (well below the MECP/CCME guideline in Ontario).
References[edit]
- ↑ Environment Canada. (2004). Canadian guidance framework for the management of phosphorus in freshwater systems. Ecosystem Health: Science‐based solutions report no. 1–8. Cat. No. En1–34/8–2004E.
- ↑ Ontario Ministry of Environment and Energy (OMOEE), 1994. Policies, Guidelines and Provincial Water Quality Objectives of the Ministry of Environment and Energy. Queen’s Printer for Ontario. Toronto, ON.
- ↑ Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME). 2002. Canadian water quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life: Total particulate matter. In: Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines, Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, Winnipeg
- ↑ TRCA. 2021. Spatial Patterns (2016-2020) and Temporal Trends (1966-2020) in Stream Water Quality across TRCA’s Jurisdiction Prepared by Watershed Planning and Ecosystem Science. https://trcaca.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com/app/uploads/2021/10/29113334/2016-2020-SWQ-Report-v11_FINAL_AODA-FA.pdf