2,216
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 36:
Line 36:
→Recent Performance Research
[[File:Schematic infitlration trench (Jeon et al., 2022).PNG|thumb|500px|Schematic drawing of the infiltration trench design configuration used by [https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/14/21/3529/pdf (Jeon et al. 2022)] at Kongju National University Cheonan Campus in South Korea. The facility includes a primary settling tank with vertical layer of woodchips, and horizontal layers of gravel, sand and bottom ash. This configuration promotes settling, filtration and adsorption. The use of woodchips allows microorganisms that assist in the removal of nitrogen and phosphorus to create an ideal environment to establish themselves and help improve overall water quality.(Jeon et al., 2022<ref>Jeon, M., Guerra, H.B., Choi, H. and Kim, L.H., 2022. Long-Term Monitoring of an Urban Stormwater Infiltration Trench in South Korea with Assessment Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Water, 14(21), p.3529.</ref>).]]
[[File:Schematic infitlration trench (Jeon et al., 2022).PNG|thumb|500px|Schematic drawing of the infiltration trench design configuration used by [https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/14/21/3529/pdf (Jeon et al. 2022)] at Kongju National University Cheonan Campus in South Korea. The facility includes a primary settling tank with vertical layer of woodchips, and horizontal layers of gravel, sand and bottom ash. This configuration promotes settling, filtration and adsorption. The use of woodchips allows microorganisms that assist in the removal of nitrogen and phosphorus to create an ideal environment to establish themselves and help improve overall water quality.(Jeon et al., 2022<ref>Jeon, M., Guerra, H.B., Choi, H. and Kim, L.H., 2022. Long-Term Monitoring of an Urban Stormwater Infiltration Trench in South Korea with Assessment Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Water, 14(21), p.3529.</ref>).]]
*[https://koreascience.kr/article/JAKO201907750243874.pdf (Yano et al., 2019) - Comparison of nutrient removal efficiency of an infiltration planter and an infiltration trench]
**This study compares the water quality performance of two common LID features ([[Stormwater planter]] and [[infiltration trench]] to cite advantages and disadvantages of implementing either practice in a parking lot catchment area over a long-term monitoring project (May 2009 to August 2018). The stormwater planter was shown to be more efficient at reducing nutrient content in effluent flow leaving both systems due to additional benefits from plant uptake and larger storage volume when compared to the trench. The study observed removal rates of TP and TSS as 76% and 83% (respectively) for the infiltration trench and 99% and 98.7% (respectively) for the planter (Yano et al., 2019<ref>Yano, K.A.V., Geronimo, F.K.F., Reyes, N.J.D.G., Jeon, M. and Kim, L. 2019. Comparison of nutrient removal efficiency of an infiltration planter and an infiltration trench. Journal of Wetlands Research, 21(4), pp.384-391.</ref>).
*[https://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/167229.pdf (Nilsson and Stigsson, 2012) - Pollutant removal efficiencies and flow detention of infiltration trenches]
**This report highlight the pollutant removal efficiency of an infiltration trench located in supermarket's parking lot in Kungsbacka, Sweden between April to June 2012. The event mean concentration (EMC) over 5 storm events during the study period measured at the inlet and outlet of the trench was 150 mg/L (in) & 21 mg/L (out) for TSS (83% reduction rate). Meanwhile, the concentrations of phosphorus were hardly detectable during the monitoring period, and a removal efficiency could not be measure effectively (Nilsson and Stigsson, 2012<ref>Nilsson, E. and Stigsson, A., 2012. Pollutant removal efficiencies and flow detention of infiltration trenches.</ref>).
==References==
==References==