Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | {|class="wikitable" |
| | |+ Performance of bioretention with internal water storage<ref>Liu J, Sample D, Bell C, Guan Y. Review and Research Needs of Bioretention Used for the Treatment of Urban Stormwater. Water. 2014;6(4):1069-1099. doi:10.3390/w6041069.</ref> |
| | |- |
| | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|Location |
| | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|Filter media composition |
| | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|Media depth (cm) |
| | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|Internal water storage depth (cm) |
| | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|I/P* |
| | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|Runoff volume reduction (%) |
| | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|TN reduction (%) |
| | !style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|TP reduction (%) |
| | |- |
| | !Montréal<ref>Géhéniau N, Fuamba M, Mahaut V, Gendron MR, Dugué M. Monitoring of a Rain Garden in Cold Climate: Case Study of a Parking Lot near Montréal. J Irrig Drain Eng. 2015;141(6):4014073. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000836.</ref> |
| | |88% sand, 8% fines, 4% OM||180||150||47||97||99||99||99 |
| | !Virginia<ref>DeBusk KM, Wynn TM. Storm-Water Bioretention for Runoff Quality and Quantity Mitigation. J Environ Eng. 2011;137(9):800-808. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000388.</ref> |
| | |88% sand, 8% fines, 4% OM||180||150||47||97||99||99||99 |
|
| |
|
| <table class="table-responsive">
| |
| <table class="table table-bordered">
| |
| <caption><strong>Performance of bioretention with internal water storage<ref>Liu J, Sample D, Bell C, Guan Y. Review and Research Needs of Bioretention Used for the Treatment of Urban Stormwater. Water. 2014;6(4):1069-1099. doi:10.3390/w6041069.</ref></strong></caption>
| |
| <tr class='success'>
| |
| <th class="text-center">Location</th>
| |
| <th class="text-center">Biomedia composition</th>
| |
| <th class="text-center">Media depth (cm)</th>
| |
| <th class="text-center">Internal water storage depth (cm)</th>
| |
| <th class="text-center">I/P*</th>
| |
| <th class="text-center">Runoff volume reduction (%)</th>
| |
| <th class="text-center">TSS reduction(%)</th>
| |
| <th class="text-center">TN reduction (%)</th>
| |
| <th class="text-center">TP reduction (%)</th>
| |
| </tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="text-center">Montréal<ref>Géhéniau N, Fuamba M, Mahaut V, Gendron MR, Dugué M. Monitoring of a Rain Garden in Cold Climate: Case Study of a Parking Lot near Montréal. J Irrig Drain Eng. 2015;141(6):4014073. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000836.</ref></td>
| |
| <td class="text-center">88% sand, 8% fines, 4% OM</td>
| |
| <td class="text-center">180</td>
| |
| <td class="text-center">150</td>
| |
| <td class="text-center">47</td>
| |
| <td class="text-center">97</td>
| |
| <td class="text-center">99</td>
| |
| <td class="text-center">99</td>
| |
| <td class="text-center">99</td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="text-center">Virginia<ref>DeBusk KM, Wynn TM. Storm-Water Bioretention for Runoff Quality and Quantity Mitigation. J Environ Eng. 2011;137(9):800-808. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000388.</ref></td>
| |
| <td class="text-center">88% sand, 8% fines, 4% OM</td>
| |
| <td class="text-center">180</td>
| |
| <td class="text-center">150</td>
| |
| <td class="text-center">47</td>
| |
| <td class="text-center">97</td>
| |
| <td class="text-center">99</td>
| |
| <td class="text-center">99</td>
| |
| <td class="text-center">99</td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td rowspan=4 class="text-center">North Carolina<ref>Brown RA, Asce AM, Hunt WF, Asce M. Underdrain Configuration to Enhance Bioretention Exfiltration to Reduce Pollutant Loads. J Environ Eng. 2011;137(11):1082-1091. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000437.</ref></td> | | <tr><td rowspan=4 class="text-center">North Carolina<ref>Brown RA, Asce AM, Hunt WF, Asce M. Underdrain Configuration to Enhance Bioretention Exfiltration to Reduce Pollutant Loads. J Environ Eng. 2011;137(11):1082-1091. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000437.</ref></td> |
| <td rowspan=4 class="text-center">96% sand, 4% fines</td> | | <td rowspan=4 class="text-center">96% sand, 4% fines</td> |
Line 101: |
Line 85: |
| *Impervious/Pervious ratio, i.e. the area of catchment divided by surface area of the cell | | *Impervious/Pervious ratio, i.e. the area of catchment divided by surface area of the cell |
| </table> | | </table> |
| ====References====
| | |
| | |
| | ==References== |
| <em><references /></em> | | <em><references /></em> |
| {{:Feedback}}
| | |
|
| |
|
| <strong>For review</strong> | | <strong>For review</strong> |