Line 17: |
Line 17: |
| !Virginia<ref>DeBusk KM, Wynn TM. Storm-Water Bioretention for Runoff Quality and Quantity Mitigation. J Environ Eng. 2011;137(9):800-808. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000388.</ref> | | !Virginia<ref>DeBusk KM, Wynn TM. Storm-Water Bioretention for Runoff Quality and Quantity Mitigation. J Environ Eng. 2011;137(9):800-808. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000388.</ref> |
| |88% sand, 8% fines, 4% OM||180||150||47||97||99||99||99 | | |88% sand, 8% fines, 4% OM||180||150||47||97||99||99||99 |
| |} | | |- |
| | !North Carolina<ref>Brown RA, Asce AM, Hunt WF, Asce M. Underdrain Configuration to Enhance Bioretention Exfiltration to Reduce Pollutant Loads. J Environ Eng. 2011;137(11):1082-1091. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000437.</ref> |
| | |rowspan="4"|96% sand, 4% fines| |
| | |rowspan="2"|110||88| |
| | |rowspan="2"|12||89| |
| | |rowspan="4"|58| |
| | |rowspan="4"|58| |
| | |rowspan="4"|-10|} |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| <tr><td rowspan=4 class="text-center">North Carolina<ref>Brown RA, Asce AM, Hunt WF, Asce M. Underdrain Configuration to Enhance Bioretention Exfiltration to Reduce Pollutant Loads. J Environ Eng. 2011;137(11):1082-1091. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000437.</ref></td>
| |
| <td rowspan=4 class="text-center">96% sand, 4% fines</td>
| |
| <td rowspan=2 class="text-center">110</td>
| |
| <td class="text-center">88</td>
| |
| <td rowspan=2 class="text-center">12</td>
| |
| <td class="text-center">89</td>
| |
| <td rowspan=4 class="text-center">58</td>
| |
| <td rowspan=4 class="text-center">58</td>
| |
| <td rowspan=4 class="text-center">-10</td></tr>
| |
| <tr><td class="text-center">58</td> | | <tr><td class="text-center">58</td> |
| <td class="text-center">93</td> | | <td class="text-center">93</td> |