8,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 26:
Line 26:
<tr><td class="text-center">42</td> <td class="text-center">100</td> </tr><tr><td class="text-center">North Carolina<ref>Li H, Sharkey LJ, Hunt WF, Davis AP. Mitigation of Impervious Surface Hydrology Using Bioretention in North Carolina and Maryland. J Hydrol Eng. 2009;14(4):407-415. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2009)14:4(407).</ref></td> <td class="text-center">loamy sand, 3% OM</td> <td class="text-center">120</td> <td class="text-center">60</td> <td class="text-center">20</td> <td class="text-center">>99</td> <td class="text-center">-</td> <td class="text-center">-</td> <td class="text-center">-</td> </tr><tr><td rowspan=2 class="text-center">North Carolina<ref>Brown RA, Hunt WF. Bioretention Performance in the Upper Coastal Plain of North Carolina. In: Low Impact Development for Urban Ecosystem and Habitat Protection. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2008:1-10. doi:10.1061/41009(333)95.</ref></td><td rowspan=2 class="text-center">98% sand, 2% fines</td>
no edit summary
|-
|-
|42||100
|42||100
|}
|-
!North Carolina<ref>Li H, Sharkey LJ, Hunt WF, Davis AP. Mitigation of Impervious Surface Hydrology Using Bioretention in North Carolina and Maryland. J Hydrol Eng. 2009;14(4):407-415. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2009)14:4(407).</ref>
|-
|loamy sand, 3% OM||120||60||20||>99||-||-||-
|-
! rowspan=2|North Carolina<ref>Brown RA, Hunt WF. Bioretention Performance in the Upper Coastal Plain of North Carolina. In: Low Impact Development for Urban Ecosystem and Habitat Protection. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2008:1-10. doi:10.1061/41009(333)95.</ref>
|-
|rowspan=2|98% sand, 2% fines
<td class="text-center">90</td>
<td class="text-center">90</td>
<td class="text-center">30</td>
<td class="text-center">30</td>