8,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 33:
Line 33:
<td class="text-center">90</td> <td class="text-center">30</td> <td class="text-center">12</td> <td class="text-center">90</td> <td class="text-center">-</td> <td class="text-center">-</td> <td class="text-center">-</td> </tr><tr><td class="text-center">90</td> <td class="text-center">60</td> <td class="text-center">12</td> <td class="text-center">98</td> <td class="text-center">-</td> <td class="text-center">-</td> <td class="text-center">-</td> </tr>
no edit summary
! rowspan=2|North Carolina<ref>Brown RA, Hunt WF. Bioretention Performance in the Upper Coastal Plain of North Carolina. In: Low Impact Development for Urban Ecosystem and Habitat Protection. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2008:1-10. doi:10.1061/41009(333)95.</ref>
! rowspan=2|North Carolina<ref>Brown RA, Hunt WF. Bioretention Performance in the Upper Coastal Plain of North Carolina. In: Low Impact Development for Urban Ecosystem and Habitat Protection. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers; 2008:1-10. doi:10.1061/41009(333)95.</ref>
|-
|-
|rowspan=2|98% sand, 2% fines
|rowspan=2|98% sand, 2% fines||90||30||12||90||-||-||-
|-
|90||60||12||98||-||-||-
|}
<tr><td rowspan=2 class="text-center">North Carolina<ref>Passeport E, Hunt WF, Line DE, Smith RA, Brown RA. Field Study of the Ability of Two Grassed Bioretention Cells to Reduce Storm-Water Runoff Pollution. J Irrig Drain Eng. 2009;135(4):505-510. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000006.</ref></td>
<tr><td rowspan=2 class="text-center">North Carolina<ref>Passeport E, Hunt WF, Line DE, Smith RA, Brown RA. Field Study of the Ability of Two Grassed Bioretention Cells to Reduce Storm-Water Runoff Pollution. J Irrig Drain Eng. 2009;135(4):505-510. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000006.</ref></td>
<td rowspan=2 class="text-center">15% sand, 80% fines, 5% OM</td>
<td rowspan=2 class="text-center">15% sand, 80% fines, 5% OM</td>