Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 280: Line 280:
*[https://lonepinebooks.com/product/plants-of-southern-ontario-2/ Plants of Southern Ontario (book), 2014, by Richard Dickinson and France Royer, Lone Pine Publishing, 528 pgs.]
*[https://lonepinebooks.com/product/plants-of-southern-ontario-2/ Plants of Southern Ontario (book), 2014, by Richard Dickinson and France Royer, Lone Pine Publishing, 528 pgs.]
*[http://www.agrifs.ir/sites/default/files/Weeds%20of%20North%20America%20%7BRichard%20Dickinson%7D%20%5B9780226076447%5D%20%282014%29_2.pdf Weeds of North America (book), 2014, by Richard Dickinson and France Royer, University of Chicago Press, 656 pgs.]
*[http://www.agrifs.ir/sites/default/files/Weeds%20of%20North%20America%20%7BRichard%20Dickinson%7D%20%5B9780226076447%5D%20%282014%29_2.pdf Weeds of North America (book), 2014, by Richard Dickinson and France Royer, University of Chicago Press, 656 pgs.]


{|class="wikitable" style="width: 1280px"
{|class="wikitable" style="width: 1280px"
Line 342: Line 341:
*Repair sunken areas when ≥ 10 cm deep and barren/eroded areas when ≥ 30 cm long;
*Repair sunken areas when ≥ 10 cm deep and barren/eroded areas when ≥ 30 cm long;
*Remove sediment when > 5 cm deep or time to drain water ponded behind [[check dams]] exceeds 48 hours.
*Remove sediment when > 5 cm deep or time to drain water ponded behind [[check dams]] exceeds 48 hours.
|[[File:Filter Bed Pass swale.PNG|295px|thumb|center|The filter bed has retained its original grading without any sharp depressions that would indicate surface bed sinking.]]  
|[[File:Filter Bed Pass swale.PNG|315px|thumb|center|The filter bed has retained its original grading without any sharp depressions that would indicate surface bed sinking.]]
[[File:Surface ponding Pass Swale.PNG|315px|thumb|center|TThe maximum surface ponding depth behind check dams matches what was specified in the final design. (Source:
Mark M. Holeman, Inc., 2015)<ref>Mark M. Holeman, Inc. 2015. What is a Bio-Swale? Authored by Rick Blankenship. 25 September 2015. Accessed 5 July 2022. http://www.holemanlandscape.com/2015/09/25/what-is-a-bio-swale/</ref>]]
|[[File:Filter Bed Fail swale.PNG|300px|thumb|center|Clear evidence of bed sinking is visible, creating a preferential ponding area where vegetation has died off.]]  
|[[File:Filter Bed Fail swale.PNG|300px|thumb|center|Clear evidence of bed sinking is visible, creating a preferential ponding area where vegetation has died off.]]  
[[File:Surface ponding Fail Swale.PNG|300px|thumb|center|The maximum ponding depth of the swale is significantly deeper than intended as the elevation of the check dam or overflow outlet is too high. (Source: Stiffler, 2012<ref>Stiffler, L. 2012.RAIN GARDEN REALITY CHECK: Comparing LID to conventional system failures. Authored by: Eric De Place. 18 April 2012. Sightline Institute. Sustainable Living Series. Accessed 5 July 2022. https://www.sightline.org/2012/04/18/rain-garden-reality-check/</ref>)]]
|-
|-
|'''[[Vegetation]]'''
|'''[[Vegetation]]'''
|
|
Deep rooting [[perennial]] grasses or a mixture of [[wildflowers]] and [[shrubs]], tolerant to both wet and dry conditions and [[salt]]; roots uptake water and return it to the atmosphere, provide habitat for organisms that break down trapped pollutants and help maintain soil structure and permeability
Deep rooting perennial [[grasses]] or a mixture of [[Perennials:_List|wildflowers]] and [[shrubs]], tolerant to both wet and dry conditions and [[salt]]; roots uptake water and return it to the atmosphere, provide habitat for organisms that break down trapped pollutants and help maintain soil structure and permeability
|
|
*Routine maintenance is the same as a conventional lawn;
*Routine maintenance is the same as a conventional lawn;
Line 354: Line 356:
*Replace dead plantings annually to achieve 80% cover by the third growing season;
*Replace dead plantings annually to achieve 80% cover by the third growing season;
*Do not apply chemical fertilizers.  
*Do not apply chemical fertilizers.  
|[[File:Vegetation bio pass.PNG|315px|thumb|center|The planted portion of the bioretention cell is completely covered with dense, attractive vegetation which helps to maintain its stormwater treatment function and aesthetic value.]]  
|[[File:Veg Cover Pass swale.PNG|315px|thumb|center|The planted portion of the swale is well covered with dense, attractive vegetation which helps to maintain its stormwater treatment function and aesthetic value.]]  
|[[File:Vegetation bio fail .PNG|290px|thumb|center|A larger portion of the bioretention cell has no vegetation cover which reduces its aesthetic value and could be negatively affecting its stormwater treatment function. Much less than 80% of the planting area is covered by living vegetation requiring immediate maintenance and reseeding.]]  
|[[File:Veg Cover Fail swale.PNG|315px|thumb|center|Major portions of the swale surface contains dead or dying vegetation which reduces its aesthetic value and could be negatively affecting its stormwater treatment function.]]
|-
|'''[[Check dams]]'''
|
Structures constructed of a non-erosive material, such as suitably sized [[Reservoir aggregate|aggregate]], wood, gabions, riprap, [[stone]] or concrete; used to slow runoff water. Can be employed in practices such as bioswales and enhanced grass swales. Constructed across a drainage ditch, [[swale]], or channel to lower the speed of concentrated flows for a certain design range of storm events and to promote infiltration.
|
*Remove accumulated sediment by rake/shovel.
*Check for signs of oil or grease contamination (e.g. sheen on surface of water when sediment is submerged). I suspected, submit a sediment sample for contaminant testing by an accredited laboratory to determine the proper disposal method.
*Assess the CDA for changes in land cover or point sources of sediment.
*Inspect and remove sediment from [[pretreatment]] devices.
*If problems persist, consider adding pretreatment devices or increasing frequency of routine maintenance.
|[[File:Check Dam Pass swale.PNG|355px|thumb|center|The check dams are visible and continue to help retain sediment and spread the flow of water across the BMP surface.]]
|[[File:Veg Cover Fail swale.PNG|355px|thumb|center|Sediment has accumulated on the upstream side of the check dam and is affecting its function. (Source: Tennessee EPSC).]]
|-
|}
 
==Tips to Preserve Basic BMP Function==
*Because the risk of compaction is higher when topsoil is saturated, any maintenance tasks involving vehicle (e.g., ride mower) or foot traffic on the filter bed should not be performed during wet weather.
*Use push mower to maintain enhanced swales with [[grasses]] as [[vegetation]] cover or the lightest ride mower equipment available to minimize compaction of the filter bed.
*Use a mulching mower to maintain enhanced swales with grass as vegetation cover or leave clippings on the surface to help replenish organic matter and nutrients in the topsoil.
*Pruning of mature [[trees]] should be performed under the guidance of a Certified Arborist.
*Woody vegetation should not be planted or allowed to become established where snow will be piled/stored during winter.
*Removal of sediment accumulated on the filter bed surface should be performed by hand with rake and shovel, or vacuum equipment where feasible. If a small excavator is the chosen method, keep the excavator off the BMP footprint to avoid damage to side slopes/embankments and compaction of the [[topsoil]].
 
==Rehabilitation & Repair==
 
Table below provides guidance on rehabilitation and repair work specific to enhanced grass swales organized according to BMP component.
[[File:Outlet covered swale.PNG|330px|thumb|link=https://sustainabletechnologies.ca/app/uploads/2018/02/Enhanced-Swales-Fact-Sheet.pdf|An example of an outlet in an enhanced swale requiring maintenance to remove built up debris and sediment. <ref>TRCA. 2018. Inspection and Maintenance of Stormwater Best Management Practices - Enhanced Swales. Fact Sheet. https://sustainabletechnologies.ca/app/uploads/2018/02/Enhanced-Swales-Fact-Sheet.pdf</ref>]]
{|{| class="wikitable" style="width:900px;"
|+'''Enhanced Swales: Key Components, Typical Issues and Rehabilitation Requirements'''
|-
!Component
!Problem
!Rehabilitation Tasks
|-
|'''[[Inlets]]'''
|
Inlets are producing concentrated flow and causing filter bed erosion
|
*Add [[Level spreaders|flow spreading device]] or re-grade existing device back to level. Rake to regrade damaged portion of the filter bed and replant. If problem persists, replace some [[vegetation|plant]] cover with [[stone]].
|-
| rowspan="3"|'''[[Swales: Construction|Filter Bed]]'''
|Local or average sediment accumulation ≥ 5 cm in depth.
|
*At [[inlets]] remove [[stone]] and use vacuum equipment or rake and shovel to remove sediment. For large areas or BMPs, use of a small excavator may be preferable. Restore grades with planting soil that meets design specifications. Test surface infiltration rate to confirm it is > 15 mm/h. Replace [[stone]] and [[vegetation]] coverage (re-use/transplant where possible). If problem persists, add [[pretreatment]] device(s) or investigate the source(s).
|-
|Surface ponding remains for > 48 hours or surface infiltration rate is < 15 mm/h.
|
*Remove sediment as described above. Core aerate (for grass swales); or remove [[stone]], sediment and [[vegetation|plant]] cover and till 5 cm of yard waste compost into the exposed planting [[Soil groups|soil]] to a depth of 20 cm; or remove and replace the uppermost 15 cm of material with planting soil that meets design specifications. Test [[Infiltration: Testing|surface infiltration rate]] to confirm it has been restored to > 15 mm/h. Replace stone and plants (re-use/transplant where possible).
|-
|Damage to filter bed or slide slope is present (e.g., [[erosion]] rills, animal burrows, sink holes, ruts)
|
*Regrade damaged portion by raking and replant or restore [[stone]] cover. Animal burrows, sink holes and compacted areas should be tilled to 20 cm depth prior to re-grading. If problems persist, consider adding [[Level spreaders|flow spreading device]] to prevent [[erosion]] or barriers to discourage foot or vehicular traffic.
|-
|'''[[Vegetation]]'''
|
Plants not thriving and planting soil is low in organic matter (<5%) or available [[Nutrients|phosphorus]] (<12 mg/kg)
|
*Remove [[stone]] and [[vegetation|plant]] cover and uppermost 5 cm of planting soil, spread 5 cm of yard waste compost, incorporate into [[Soil groups|soil]] to 20 cm depth by tilling. Replace stone and plants (re-use/transplant where possible).
|-
|-
|}
|}
==Inspection Time Commitments and Costs==
Estimates are based on a typical partial infiltration bioretention design (i.e., includes a sub-drain); estimates for other designs (i.e., full infiltration and no-infiltration) can be found in the [https://sustainabletechnologies.ca/app/uploads/2016/08/LID-IM-Guide-7.1-Bioretention-and-Dry-Swales.pdf Low Impact Development (LID) Stormwater Management Practice Inspection and Maintenance Guide]<br>
</br>
[[File:Time commit cost swale.PNG|thumb|left|400px|General time commitments and costs for inspection of enhanced swale features (in 2016 $ figures).<ref>TRCA. 2018. Inspection and Maintenance of Stormwater Best Management Practices. Bioretention - Fact Sheet. https://sustainabletechnologies.ca/app/uploads/2018/02/Bioretention-and-Dry-Swales-Fact-Sheet.pdf</ref>]]
[[File:Per-task cost estimate swale.PNG|thumb|400px|Per-task cost estimates for maintenance and rehabilitation of enhanced swale features (in 2016 $ figures).<ref>TRCA. 2018. Inspection and Maintenance of Stormwater Best Management Practices. Bioretention - Fact Sheet. https://sustainabletechnologies.ca/app/uploads/2018/02/Bioretention-and-Dry-Swales-Fact-Sheet.pdf</ref>]]
[[File:Construction life cycle cost swale.PNG|thumb|center|400px|Construction and life cycle cost estimates for enhanced swale features (in 2016 $ figures).<ref>TRCA. 2018. Inspection and Maintenance of Stormwater Best Management Practices. Bioretention - Fact Sheet. https://sustainabletechnologies.ca/app/uploads/2018/02/Bioretention-and-Dry-Swales-Fact-Sheet.pdf</ref>]]<br>
</br>
</br>
</br>
</br>
</br>
</br>
Estimates of the life cycle costs of inspection and maintenance have been produced using the latest version of the [[Cost analysis resources|LID Life Cycle Costing Tool]] for three design variations (full infiltration, partial infiltration and no infiltration) to assist stormwater infrastructure planners, designers and asset managers with planning and preparing budgets for potential LID features.
Assumptions for the above costs and the following table below are based on the following:
*Capital costs included within the category of construction include those related to site assessment, and conceptual and detailed design related tasks such as borehole analysis and soil testing. All material, delivery, labour, equipment (rental, operation, operator), hauling and disposal costs are accounted for within the construction costs of the facility. Standard union costs were derived from the RSMeans database in 2010 and have been adjusted for 5 year inflation of 8.79% (2010 to June, 2015).
**Costs include overhead and inflation to represent contractor pricing. It was assumed the practice is part of a new development (i.e., not a retrofit), thereby excluding (de)mobilization costs unless a particular piece of equipment would not normally have been present at the site. Additionally, it was assumed that excavated soil associated with construction of the BMP would be reused elsewhere on site. Overhead costs were presumed to consist of construction management (4.5%), design (2.5%), small tools (0.5%), clean up (0.3%) and other (2.2%).
*For maintenance frequencies and requirements and the life span of each practice are based on both literature and practical experience. Life cycle and associated maintenance costs are evaluated over a 50 year timeframe, which is the typical period over which infrastructure decisions are made.
*For enhanced grass swales it is assumed that some rehabilitation (e.g., rehabilitative maintenance) work will be needed on the filter bed surface once the BMP reaches 25 and 50 years of age in order to maintain functional drainage performance at an acceptable level. Included in the rehabilitation costs are (de)mobilization costs, as equipment would not have been present on site. Design costs were not included in the rehabilitation as it was assumed that the original LID practice design would be used to inform this work. The annual average maintenance cost does not include rehabilitation costs and therefore represents an average of routine maintenance tasks, as outlined in the Table under section, [[Inspection and Maintenance: Enhanced Swales#Routine Maintenance - Key Components and I&M Tasks|Routine Maintenance - Key Components and I&M Tasks]] above. All cost value estimates represent the net present value (NPV) as the calculation takes into account average annual interest (2%) and discount (3%) rates over the evaluation time periods.
*For all enhanced swale design variations, the CDA has been defined as a 2,000 m2 impervious pavement area plus the footprint area of a bioretention cell that is 133 m2 in size, as per design recommendations. The impervious area to pervious area ratio (I:P ratio) used to size the BMP footprint is 15:1, which is the maximum ratio recommended in the LID SWM Planning and Design Guide (CVC & TRCA, 2010)<ref>CVC and TRCA. 2010. Low Impact Development Stormwater Management Planning and Design Guide. Version 1.0. https://cvc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/LID-SWM-Guide-v1.0_2010_1_no-appendices.pdf</ref>. It is assumed that water drains to the cell through curb inlets spaced 6 m apart with stone cover on the filter bed at the inlets to dissipate the energy of the flowing water.
*Estimates of the life cycle costs of Enhanced Swales in Canadian dollars per unit CDA ($/m2) are presented in the table below. The [[Cost analysis resources|LID Life Cycle Costing Tool]] allows users to select what BMP type and design variation applies, and to use the default assumptions to generate planning level cost estimates.
**Users can also input their own values relating to a site or area, design, unit costs, and inspection and maintenance task frequencies to generate customized cost estimates, specific to a certain project, context or stormwater infrastructure program.
**For all BMP design variations and maintenance scenarios, it is assumed that rehabilitation of part or all of the filter bed surface will be necessary once the BMP reaches 25 and 50 years of age to maintain acceptable surface drainage performance (e.g., surface ponding drainage time). Filter bed rehabilitation for enhanced swales is assumed to typically involve the tasks outlined under section, [[Inspection and Maintenance: Enhanced Swales#Routine Maintenance - Key Components and I&M Tasks|Routine Maintenance - Key Components and I&M Tasks]] above.<br>
</br>
[[File:Life cycle costs swales.PNG|thumb|center|900px|Life cycle cost estimates for all variation types of [[enhanced swales]] under minimum and high frequency scenarios (in 2016 $ figures).<ref>TRCA. 2018. Inspection and Maintenance of Stormwater Best Management Practices. Bioretention - Fact Sheet. https://sustainabletechnologies.ca/app/uploads/2018/02/Bioretention-and-Dry-Swales-Fact-Sheet.pdf</ref>]]
'''Notes:'''
<small>
#Estimated life cycle costs represent NPV of associated costs in Canadian dollars per square metre of CDA ($/m2).
#Average annual maintenance cost estimates represent NPV of all costs incurred over the time period and do not include rehabilitation costs.
#Rehabilitation cost estimates represent NPV of all costs related to repair work assumed to occur every 25 years including those associated with inspection and maintenance over a two (2) year establishment period for the plantings.
#Life cycle costs are very similar but slightly lower for BMPs constructed with filter sock or rock check dams, than concrete ones due to differences in material and labor unit costs.
#Rehabilitation costs are estimated to be between 24.4 to 28.1% of the original construction costs for High Frequency and Minimum Recommended maintenance program scenarios, respectively.
# Maintenance and rehabilitation costs over a 25 year time period are estimated to be 1.77 to 2.66 times the original construction cost, for the Minimum Recommended and High Frequency maintenance scenarios respectively, depending on check dam construction material.
# Maintenance and rehabilitation costs over a 50 year time period are estimated to be 3.13 and 4.74 times the original construction cost for the Minimum Recommended and High Frequency maintenance scenarios respectively, depending on check dam construction material.</small>
==Inspection Field Data Sheet==
Feel free to '''download''' (downward facing arrow on the top righthand side) and '''print''' (Pinter emoticon on top right hand side) the following [[enhanced swales|Enhanced Swale]] Inspection Field Data Form developed by TRCA, STEP and its partners for the [https://sustainabletechnologies.ca/app/uploads/2016/08/LID-IM-Guide-2016-1.pdf Low Impact Development Stormwater Management Practice Inspection and Maintenance Guide]<ref>STEP. 2016. Low Impact Development Stormwater Management Practice Inspection and Maintenance Guide. https://sustainabletechnologies.ca/app/uploads/2016/08/LID-IM-Guide-2016-1.pdf</ref>.
The 6 page document prompts users to fill out details previously mentioned above on this page in other sections about various zones associated with [[Enhanced swales|Enhanced swale]] features (i.e. inlets, perimeter of the feature, filter bed, outlets, etc.) and describe why each area is a pass or fail, and if remediate action is required and under what timeframe it would be completed by. Furthermore, the forms prompt the reviewer to determine what type of  inspection is being conducted for the feature in question: Construction (C), Routine Operation (RO), Maintenance Verification (MV), or Performance Verification (PV). <br>
<br>
[[File:Newly developed swale.PNG|thumb|330px|Example of a newly developed enhanced swale in a recently developed subdivision.]]
<pdf width="900" height="800">File:Swales inspection sheet.pdf</pdf>
==References==

Navigation menu