Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 156: Line 156:
# After every large storm event (e.g., 15 mm rainfall depth or greater) to ensure ESCs and pretreatment or flow diversion devices are functioning and adequately maintained.  View the table below, which describes critical points during the construction sequence when inspections should be performed prior to proceeding further. You can also download and print the table [https://wikidev.sustainabletechnologies.ca/images/a/a6/LID-IM-Guide-7.5-Underground-Infiltration-Systems.pdf '''here''']<br>
# After every large storm event (e.g., 15 mm rainfall depth or greater) to ensure ESCs and pretreatment or flow diversion devices are functioning and adequately maintained.  View the table below, which describes critical points during the construction sequence when inspections should be performed prior to proceeding further. You can also download and print the table [https://wikidev.sustainabletechnologies.ca/images/a/a6/LID-IM-Guide-7.5-Underground-Infiltration-Systems.pdf '''here''']<br>
</br>
</br>
[[File:Catchbasin isnert underground.PNG|thumb|400px|A [[pretreatment]] device (catchbasin insert) upstream of an underground infiltration system inlet in need of cleaning out. These devices are designed to limit the amount of trash, debris, sediment, oil and grease entering the infiltration system, which helps to prevent clogging and maintain its drainage performance  (Source: TRCA, 2018<ref name="example1" />).]]  
[[File:Catchbasin isnert underground.PNG|thumb|400px|A [[pretreatment]] device (hydrodynamic (i.e., oil and grit) separator) upstream of an underground infiltration system inlet in need of cleaning out. These devices are designed to limit the amount of trash, debris, sediment, oil and grease entering the infiltration system, which helps to prevent clogging and maintain its drainage performance  (Source: TRCA, 2018<ref name="example1" />).]]  


{| class="wikitable" style="width: 800px;"
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 800px;"
Line 211: Line 211:
==Routine Maintenance - Key Components and I&M Tasks==
==Routine Maintenance - Key Components and I&M Tasks==
Regular inspections (twice annually, at a minimum) done as part of routine maintenance tasks over the operating phase of the BMP life cycle to determine if maintenance task frequencies are adequate and determine when rehabilitation or further investigations into BMP function are warranted.
Regular inspections (twice annually, at a minimum) done as part of routine maintenance tasks over the operating phase of the BMP life cycle to determine if maintenance task frequencies are adequate and determine when rehabilitation or further investigations into BMP function are warranted.
Periodic inspections done every 5 years (maintenance verifications) and every 15 years (performance verifications) post-construction over the operating life cycle of the BMP to ensure compliance with the maintenance agreement (e.g., [https://www.ontario.ca/page/environmental-compliance-approval Environmental Compliance Approval permit]) conditions, evaluate functional performance and determine when rehabilitation or replacement is necessary.
Requirements of the Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act regulation for individuals working in confined spaces ([https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/050632 O.Reg. 632/05]) must be adhered to during any inspection or
maintenance work on underground infiltration systems that involves entry into confined spaces (e.g., catchbasins, manholes, access hatches). Individuals working in such environments should be adequately trained on the use and maintenance of the necessary safety equipment and review hazards and safety plans regularly. Further information about Ontario’s Confined Spaces Regulation and Guideline can be accessed here: [https://www.ontario.ca/document/guideline-working-confined-spaces Confined Spaces Guideline - Ministry of Labour, Immigration, Training and Skills Development].


Table below describes routine maintenance tasks for underground infiltration systems ([[infiltration chambers]], [[infiltration trenches]], [[bioswales]], etc.) organized by BMP component, along with recommended minimum frequencies. It also suggests higher frequencies for certain tasks that may be warranted for BMPs located in highly visible locations or those receiving flow from high traffic (vehicle or pedestrian) areas. Tasks involving removal of trash, debris and sediment and weeding/trimming of vegetation for BMPs in such contexts may need to be done more frequently (i.e., higher standards may be warranted).  
Table below describes routine maintenance tasks for underground infiltration systems ([[infiltration chambers]], [[infiltration trenches]], [[bioswales]], etc.) organized by BMP component, along with recommended minimum frequencies. It also suggests higher frequencies for certain tasks that may be warranted for BMPs located in highly visible locations or those receiving flow from high traffic (vehicle or pedestrian) areas. Tasks involving removal of trash, debris and sediment and weeding/trimming of vegetation for BMPs in such contexts may need to be done more frequently (i.e., higher standards may be warranted).  
Line 285: Line 290:
*Provide a means of draining [[infiltration chambers]] by gravity (e.g., pipe and valve through the control structure weir wall) to make [[inspection and maintenance]] work that requires drainage of the BMP (e.g., filter bed and control structure inspection and sediment removal, repairs to control structure) easier to perform.
*Provide a means of draining [[infiltration chambers]] by gravity (e.g., pipe and valve through the control structure weir wall) to make [[inspection and maintenance]] work that requires drainage of the BMP (e.g., filter bed and control structure inspection and sediment removal, repairs to control structure) easier to perform.
*To remove accumulated sediment from [[underdrain]] pipes and chamber system units, a hydrovac truck equipped with a JetVac nozzle should be employed that uses pressured jets of water to propel itself through the structure while scouring and directing suspending sediments to a collection point. As the nozzle is retrieved, the sediment is flushed into the manhole or catchbasin sump for removal by vacuuming. Selecting an appropriate JetVac nozzle will depend on the structure being cleaned. For chamber system units, fixed nozzles designed for culverts or large diameter pipe cleaning with rear-facing jets are preferable (consult product manufacturer for further guidance).
*To remove accumulated sediment from [[underdrain]] pipes and chamber system units, a hydrovac truck equipped with a JetVac nozzle should be employed that uses pressured jets of water to propel itself through the structure while scouring and directing suspending sediments to a collection point. As the nozzle is retrieved, the sediment is flushed into the manhole or catchbasin sump for removal by vacuuming. Selecting an appropriate JetVac nozzle will depend on the structure being cleaned. For chamber system units, fixed nozzles designed for culverts or large diameter pipe cleaning with rear-facing jets are preferable (consult product manufacturer for further guidance).
==Rehabilitation & Repair==
Table below provides guidance on rehabilitation and repair work specific to underground infiltration systems organized according to BMP component.<br>
</br>
[[File:Underdrain clogded underground.PNG|thumb|340px|The manhole sump is becoming filled with sediment, trash and excess and debris, which is beginning to impair flow of stormwater into the [[perforated pipe]] of the [[exfiltration trench|exfiltration storm sewer system.]]]]
{|{| class="wikitable" style="width: 900px;"
|+'''Underground Infiltration Systems: Key Components, Typical Issues and Rehabilitation Requirements'''
|-
!Component
!Problem
!Rehabilitation Tasks
|-
| rowspan="2"|'''[[Underdrains|Sub-drain/Underdrain]]'''
|Sub-drain perforated pipe is obstructed by trash, debris, sediment or roots
|
*Schedule hydro-vac truck or drain-snaking service to remove the obstruction.
|-
|Perforated pipe caps are missing or damaged
|
*Replace missing or damaged caps.
|-
|'''[[Forebays|Isolator Row or Water Quality Forebay Unit]]'''
|
Sump is ≥ half full or average sediment depth is ≥ 8 cm
|
*Schedule maintenance work; First remove floating trash and debris by bucket strainer, then oil and grease by petroleum absorbing sponge. Then fully drain the row or unit by gravity, pumping or vacuuming, and remove accumulated sediment through use of a hydro-vac truck equipped with JetVac nozzle.
|-
|'''Manhole control structure'''
|
Structure or pipe connection is leaking and impairing the water storage capacity or function of the BMP
|
*Schedule work to repair cracks or seal leaking components. The BMP may need to be fully drained to make such repairs.
|}
==Inspection Time Commitments and Costs==
Estimates are based on a typical [[infiltration trench]] design that receives roof and road runoff and includes a [[oil and grit separators|hydrodynamic separator]] as pretreatment; estimates for [[infiltration trenches]] that receive roof runoff only are described in the [https://sustainabletechnologies.ca/app/uploads/2016/08/LID-IM-Guide-7.5-Underground-Infiltration-Systems.pdf Low Impact Development (LID) Stormwater Management Practice Inspection and Maintenance Guide]<br>
</br>
[[File:Time & cost estimates underground.PNG|thumb|left|400px|General time commitments and costs for inspection of underground infiltration systems designed to receive roof and road runoff and includes a [[Oil and grit separators|hydrodynamic separator]] as pretreatment (in 2016 $ figures)<ref name="example2">TRCA. 2018. Inspection and Maintenance of Stormwater Best Management Practices. Underground Infiltration Systems - Fact Sheet. https://sustainabletechnologies.ca/app/uploads/2018/02/Underground-Infiltration-Systems-Fact-Sheet.pdf</ref>.]]
[[File:Task cost underground.PNG|thumb|400px|Per-task cost estimates for maintenance and rehabilitation of underground infiltration systems designed to receive roof and road runoff and includes a [[Oil and grit separators|hydrodynamic separator]] as pretreatment (in 2016 $ figures)<ref name="example2" />.]]
[[File:Construction & life cycle underground.PNG|thumb|center|400px|Construction and life cycle cost estimates for underground infiltration systems designed to receive roof and road runoff and includes a [[Oil and grit separators|hydrodynamic separator]] as pretreatment (in 2016 $ figures)<ref name="example2" />.]]<br>
Estimates of the life cycle costs of inspection and maintenance have been produced using the latest version of the [[Cost analysis resources|LID Life Cycle Costing Tool]] for two types of underground infiltration systems:
[[infiltration trenches]] and [[infiltration chambers|infiltration chamber systems]] to assist stormwater infrastructure planners, designers and asset managers with planning and preparing budgets for potential LID features.
Assumptions for the above costs and the following table below are based on the following:
*For underground infiltration systems it is assumed that no rehabilitation work will be needed to maintain drainage performance at an acceptable level over a 50 year period of operation, given that [[pretreatment]] devices are in place upstream and are being adequately maintained. The annual average maintenance cost value represents an average of routine maintenance tasks, as outlined in table, Underground Infiltration Systems: Key Components, Descriptions and Routine I&M Requirements, above. All cost value estimates represent the Net Present Value (NPV) as the calculation takes into account average annual interest (2%) and discount (3%) rates over the evaluation time periods.
*For each type, two design variations have been examined: BMPs designed to receive roof runoff only; and BMPs designed to receive a combination of roof and road runoff. For each system type and design variation, life cycle cost estimates have been calculated for two level-of-service scenarios: the minimum recommended frequency of inspection and maintenance tasks (i.e., Table Visual Indicators Framework - Underground Infiltration Systems and table, Underground Infiltration Systems: Key Components, Descriptions and Routine I&M Requirements, above), and a high frequency scenario to provide an indication of the potential range.
*For all design variations, the CDA is assumed to be composed of a 2,000 m<sup>2</sup> roof for the roof runoff only design variation, and a 500 m<sup>2</sup> roof and 1,500 m<sup>2</sup> impermeable pavement area for the roof and road runoff design. All are sized to retain runoff from a 34 mm rain event and assumed to have a native sub-soil infiltration rate of 34 mm/h. An impervious drainage area to pervious area ratio (I:P ratio) of 20:1 is used to size the BMP footprint area, in accordance with the LID SWM Planning and Design Guide recommendations [https://sustainabletechnologies.ca/app/uploads/2013/01/LID-SWM-Guide-v1.0_2010_1_no-appendices.pdf LID SWM Planning and Design Guide (CVC & TRCA, 2010)]. The infiltration trench is assumed to be 1.630 m deep, 2.0 m wide and 50.0 m long. The infiltration chamber system is assumed to be 1.067 m deep, 8.0 m wide and 12.5 m long.
*For all design variations, the invert of the overflow outlet pipe is located 1.2 m below the surface to protect against frost. Monitoring wells are provided to facilitate inspections. In the roof runoff only design, there is no pretreatment other than a sump in the control manhole which allows for some settling of coarse sediment and debris. In the roof and road runoff design, pretreatment is provided by a hydrodynamic (i.e., oil and grit) separator for the impermeable pavement portion of the CDA.
*Estimates of the life cycle costs of infiltration trenches and chamber systems in Canadian dollars per unit CDA ($/m<sup>2</sup>) are presented above. The LID Life Cycle Costing Tool allows users to select what BMP type and design variation applies, and to use the default assumptions to generate planning level cost estimates. Users can also input their own values relating to a site or area, design, unit costs, and inspection and maintenance task frequencies to generate customized cost estimates, specific to a certain project, context or stormwater infrastructure program.
<br>
</br>
[[File:Minimum high fre cost underground.PNG|thumb|center|900px|Life cycle cost estimates for [[infiltration trenches]] under minimum and high frequency scenarios (in 2016 $ figures).<ref>TRCA. 2016. Low Impact Development Stormwater Management Practice Inspection and Maintenance Guide. Prepared by the Sustainable Technologies Evaluation Program. Vaughan, Ontario. https://sustainabletechnologies.ca/app/uploads/2016/08/LID-IM-Guide-7.5-Underground-Infiltration-Systems.pdf</ref>]]
'''Notes:'''
<small>
#Estimated life cycle costs represent NPV of associated costs in Canadian dollars per square metre of CDA ($/m<sup>2</sup>).
#Average annual maintenance cost estimates represent NPV of all costs incurred over the time period and do not include rehabilitation costs.
#Life cycle costs are higher for BMPs designed to receive roof and road runoff due to additional costs associated with the [[Oil and grit separators|hydrodynamic (i.e., oil and grit) separator]] and associated inspection and routine maintenance.
#Life cycle cost estimates are similar between [[infiltration trench]] and [[infiltration chambers]] system designs, and predicted to be slightly higher for infiltration trenches compared to chamber systems (construction and maintenance costs).
#Maintenance costs over a 25 year time period for roof runoff only infiltration trenches are estimated to be 30.4% of the original construction cost for the Minimum Recommended Frequency maintenance scenario, and 38.9% for the High Frequency maintenance scenario.
#Maintenance costs over a 25 year time period for roof and road runoff [[infiltration trenches]] are estimated to be 67.0% of the original construction cost for the Minimum Recommended Frequency maintenance scenario, and 1.19 times the original construction cost for the High Frequency maintenance scenario.
#Maintenance costs over a 50 year time period for roof runoff only [[infiltration trenches]] are estimated to be 58.9% of the original construction cost for the Minimum Recommended Frequency maintenance scenario, and 74.0% for the High Frequency maintenance scenario.
#Maintenance costs over a 50 year time period for roof and road runoff infiltration trenches are estimated to be 1.24 times the original construction cost for the Minimum Recommended Frequency maintenance scenario, and 2.20 times for the High Frequency maintenance scenario.
</small>
==Inspection Field Data Sheet==
Feel free to '''download''' (downward facing arrow on the top righthand side) and '''print''' (Pinter emoticon on top right hand side) the following Underground Infiltration Systems Inspection Field Data Form developed by TRCA, STEP and its partners for the [https://sustainabletechnologies.ca/app/uploads/2016/08/LID-IM-Guide-2016-1.pdf Low Impact Development Stormwater Management Practice Inspection and Maintenance Guide]<ref>STEP. 2016. Low Impact Development Stormwater Management Practice Inspection and Maintenance Guide. https://sustainabletechnologies.ca/app/uploads/2016/08/LID-IM-Guide-2016-1.pdf</ref>.
The 4 page document prompts users to fill out details previously mentioned above on this page in other sections about various zones associated with [[Infiltration Trenches]], [[Infiltration chambers]], [[Exfiltration trench]], [[Soakaways]], and other associated features (i.e. inlets, CDA, filter bed, outlets, etc.) and describe why each area is a pass or fail, and if remediate action is required and under what timeframe it would be completed by. Furthermore, the forms prompt the reviewer to determine what type of  inspection is being conducted for the feature in question: Construction (C), Routine Operation (RO), Maintenance Verification (MV), or Performance Verification (PV). <br>
<br>
[[File:Infiltration chamber underground.PNG|thumb|340px|An [[infiltration trench]] under construction. (Photo Source: TRCA).]]
<pdf width="900" height="800">File:Inspection field data sheet underground.pdf</pdf>
==References==

Navigation menu