Difference between revisions of "Documentation"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Jenny Hill (talk | contribs) |
Jenny Hill (talk | contribs) m |
||
Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
| x | | x | ||
| | | | ||
| Layer order (filter, [[reservoir]], [[geotextiles]] (if using)) and specifications (gradation, hydraulic conductivity, void space) | | Layer order (filter, [[reservoir aggregates|reservoir]], [[choker course]], [[geotextiles]] (if using)) and specifications (gradation, hydraulic conductivity, void space) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Depth | | Depth |
Revision as of 15:52, 19 October 2018
The following, comprehensive list is presented as a basis for discussion between regulatory authorities and design practitioners.
Site Description[edit]
- Location (key plan, municipal address, nearest roads, watershed and subwatershed);
- Existing Conditions (land use on site and surrounding areas);
- Natural Heritage features;
- Proposed Conditions;
- Drainage Area (for the site, tributary and watershed);
- Watercourses, wetlands present on site, and type (permanent or intermittent);
- Drainage patterns and ultimate drainage location/outfall;
Background Information[edit]
- Pre-submission meeting verification;
- Reports from pre-consultation with MOECP and other agencies (especially related LID credits);
- Watershed plans;
- Sub-Watershed plans;
- Master drainage plans (MDPs);
- Other previous reports and relevant SWM requirements;
- Existing models;
- Geotechnical report;
- Hydrogeological report;
Figures and drawings[edit]
- Location plan in the report;
- Key plan on the drawings;
- All watercourses and names of watercourses shown on all figures and drawings;
- Pre-development and post-development drainage plans for hydrologic model(s) which include:
- Existing contours;
- Drainage direction (minor and major system);
- Catchments ID's;
- Areas and imperviousness;
- Uncontrolled areas;
- 100 year capture;
- Site outlets; and
- LID facility location and associated tributary areas;
- Model schematics;
- Storm drainage, grading and general servicing plans;
- LID practice design drawings and details;
- Erosion and sediment control plans;
Parameter | Plan | Detail | Profile | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
Location | x | Area extent shown on plan view (bump-outs, municipal reserves, private lots, parks) | ||
Surface area | x | Outlined on plan view drawings and stated in report | ||
Inlet | x | x | shown on plan view and typical details provided (curb cuts, flow spreader, ribbon curb) | |
Materials | x | Materials specs (soil, drainage layer), depth, hydraulic conductivity, porosity | ||
Vegetation | x | x | Planting plan and vegetation details (species, mature density, succession plan) | |
Outlet | x | x | x | Underdrain spec and slope, spill elevation, catch basin type and grate, weir type and location, inlet control device details |
Catchment | x | Delineated catchment area directed to bioretention facility | ||
Subsurface materials | x | Layer order (filter, reservoir, choker course, geotextiles (if using)) and specifications (gradation, hydraulic conductivity, void space) | ||
Depth | x | x | Depth of each layer, reservoir retention depth (if applicable), surface ponding depth (if applicable) | |
Slope | x | x | Sub-base slope and surface slope | |
Flow Arrows | x | From contributing area and overflow route | ||
Water depth | x | Ponding depth and water surface elevation during design storm and maximum prior to overflow | ||
Inundation | x | Extent of of inundation during design storms | ||
Erosion control | x | x | Located at inlet, outlet if overland spill |
Design Information[edit]
- Consistent hydrology modelling to be utilized for each development application and/or consistent with MESP/MSP/Studies.
- Supporting information has been included for all modelling parameters and calculations.
- Stage-Storage-Discharge calculations provided for each LID facility including design information on control and emergency overflow weirs.
- Flow and storage summary tables provided which reference the associated drainage area, catchment ID, outlet(s) and differentiate between controlled and uncontrolled areas.
- Identify and show seasonal high groundwater levels in report and on drawings;
- Per MOECC SWM manual, 2003 (i.e. Drainage area, required volume, slopes, forebay, etc.);
- The SWM report and drawings are to include a table summarizing required storage, provided storage and associated elevation and flow for the permanent pool, 25mm (extended detention), and 2 through 100 year return period storm events where applicable for each facility;
- An operations and maintenance manual (includings a maintenance schedule) should be included in the SWM Report for all LID facilities in accordance with municipal requirements;
- Complete information on proposed manufactured treatment devices is to be provided including current status under ETV protocols;
Quantity control[edit]
- Runoff coefficient or imperviousness calculations;
- Analysis using appropriate storm distributions;
- Pre-development peak flow (m³/s);
- Post-development uncontrolled peak flow (m³/s);
- Post-development controlled peak flow (m³/s);
- LID Facility Type;
- Stage – Storage – Discharge Table;
- Outlet design and calculations;
- Total storage required (m3);
- Total storage provided (m3);
- Table comparing provided versus required;
- Overland flow conveyance and design;
- External drainage conveyance (100 year and Regional);
Quality control[edit]
- Level of Protection;
- Drainage Area to Facility in hectares;
- Percentage Impervious – total and directly connected areas;
- SWM Facility Monitoring and Maintenance Requirements;
Hazard land management[edit]
- Regional event and 1:100 year flood lines under existing and proposed conditions shown on appropriate plan drawings;
- Valley top of bank, stream erosion, steep slope allowances and meanderbelt assessed (confined stream systems only);
- Wetlands and required setbacks determined and identified on plans;
- Meanderbelt assessment and/or setback determined and identified on plans;
- Wave uprush and/or wind setup elevations calculated;
- “Limit of development” shown on plans;
- Survey and floodplain mapping submitted (see below);
- Hydraulic modelling and analysis including digital files;
Other[edit]
- Upon approval of the SWM design, a digital copy of the stormwater drainage plan is to be submitted including the location and size of the SWM facility in GIS format;
Floodplain mapping and documentation minimum requirements[edit]
- Hydraulic sections with regulated floodplain elevations and cross-section identification;
- Existing and proposed floodplain delineation;
- Topographic information including elevations and contours;
- Conveyance structures including dams, bridges, culverts and weirs;
- Man-made structures as applicable including buildings, roads, railways and trails;
- Natural reservoirs or natural storage areas;
- Spills analysis as applicable;
- Cut/fill analysis in the regulated area as applicable;
- Natural features such as watercourses and wetlands;
- Floodplain mapping and supporting documentation signed and stamped by a P.Eng.
Survey documentation minimum requirements[edit]
For any submission which contains drawings or figures that present survey information, the following list of minimum requirements must be included:
- Document with text descriptor identifying overall approach and methodology;
- Drawing/Figure Title;
- Date, and Revision List where applicable;
- Legible Scale and North direction arrow;
- OLS Surveyor Name and contact information, as applicable;
- Geodetic benchmark data used in survey, as applicable;
- Available survey data for topographic surface, structures, features, etc.;
- Structures invert, obvert elevations and dimensions as applicable;
- Bathymetry as applicable;
- Documentation to support reported data accuracy;
- Methodology for survey data collected i.e. Total Station, GIS, Rod and Level;
- Photo log of structures survey including upstream, downstream and structures completed with structure survey;
- Drawings and / or figures to be submitted both electronically and in hard copy as requested;
- Digital copy of the survey data when applicable; and
- Submission components to be stamped and signed by an OLS, P.Eng. or C.E.T. as relevant.
Geospatial data submission minimum requirements[edit]
For a submission which contain drawings, figures, reports, modelling and / or memos that present geospatial information and its analysis; the following list of minimum requirements must be included:
- Text summary identifying methodology and software used in geospatial analysis;
- Acquisition type i.e. LIDAR, orthophotos, etc.;
- Date of data acquisition;
- Name of supplier of digital information and their contact information;
- Quality Assurance / Quality Control methodology for geo-spatial as applicable;
- Data Co-ordinate system;
- Data Projection;
- Data Horizontal and vertical resolution;
- Data Accuracy for each axis as applicable;
- Description of grid resolution;
- Drawing and / or figure scale identified as applicable;
- Contours presented at minimum 0.5 m increments;
- Orthophoto Elevation Data i.e. study area break lines and DTM points;
- LIDAR Elevation Data i.e. study area point cloud (as applicable);
- Digital Elevation Model (DEM) as applicable;
- Description of modifications to surface including adjustments to the TIN from other sources (i.e. surveyed culverts, new infrastructure invert and obvert elevations etc.);
- Flood limit data;
- Drawings and / or figures to be submitted both electronically and in hard copy when requested;
- In modelling files and documentation to maintain existing watercourse naming conventions were applicable;
- Projected Co-ordinate system: Preferably NAD 1983 UTM Zone 17N;
- Accepted Original Geospatial Data file format: File Geodatabase or Shapefiles; and
- Submission components to be stamped and signed by an OLS, P.Eng. or C.E.T. as relevant.