Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 37: Line 37:
==Recent Performance Research==
==Recent Performance Research==


*[https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/14/21/3529 (Jeon et al., 2022) - Long-Term Monitoring of an Urban Stormwater Infiltration Trench in South Korea]
*[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1747-6593.2011.00254.x (O'Hogain et al. 2012) - Physicochemical and microbiological quality of harvested rainwater from an agricultural installation in Ireland]
**This paper discusses a long-term monitoring program (8 years) to measure the performance of an infiltration trench and develop a model to be used to estimate influent and effluent stormwater quality based on average removal efficiencies. The study found that the specific trench configuration used (with a primary settling tank with a vertical layer of woodchips, along with horizontal layers of gravel, sand and bottom ash (see associated image to the right on this page). Over the 8-year study (2013 - 2022, in 2017 no monitoring took place due to construction) was able to remove an average of 83% of TSS and 79% of TP (39.31 mg/L & 0.17 mg/L respectively for effluent water quality) (Jeon et al., 2022<ref>Jeon, M., Guerra, H.B., Choi, H. and Kim, L.H. 2022. Long-Term Monitoring of an Urban Stormwater Infiltration Trench in South Korea with Assessment Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Water, 14(21), p.3529.</ref>).
**This research study conducted by the Dublin Institute of Technology was commissioned by the federal government to assess the feasibility of utilizing rainwater to replace treated mains for non-potable uses (bathing, irrigation, etc.) on an agricultural property. Two different rainwater harvesting configurations were developed and the results collected over a 1-year period found that median TSS levels were 3.0 mg/L for configuration 1 and 3.5 mg/L for configuration 2. The only parameter that did not comply with local drinking water regulations were the levels of iron, lead and ammonia collected in the cistern of configuration 1 and just ammonia for configuration 2 (O'Hogain et al. 2012<ref>O'Hogain, S., McCarton, L., McIntyre, N., Pender, J. and Reid, A. 2012. Physicochemical and microbiological quality of harvested rainwater from an agricultural installation in Ireland. Water and Environment Journal, 26(1), pp.1-6.</ref>).


[[File:Schematic infitlration trench (Jeon et al., 2022).PNG|thumb|500px|Schematic drawing of the infiltration trench design configuration used by [https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/14/21/3529/pdf (Jeon et al. 2022)] at Kongju National University Cheonan Campus in South Korea. The facility includes a primary settling tank with vertical layer of woodchips, and horizontal layers of gravel, sand and bottom ash. This configuration promotes settling, filtration and adsorption. The use of woodchips allows microorganisms that assist in the removal of nitrogen and phosphorus to create an ideal environment to establish themselves and help improve overall water quality.(Jeon et al., 2022<ref>Jeon, M., Guerra, H.B., Choi, H. and Kim, L.H., 2022. Long-Term Monitoring of an Urban Stormwater Infiltration Trench in South Korea with Assessment Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Water, 14(21), p.3529.</ref>).]]
[[File:Cost effectiveness RWH.PNG|thumb|500px|Schematic drawing of a RWH system with larger capacity for residential or commercial usage. In this schematic pre-storage filtration is used to prevent excess sedimentation, leaves and detritus from entering the system. A piping network delivers water to the tank and a first flush diverter can be installed to diver the first 1-3 mm away from the storage container and be deposited as overland flow, preserving the quality of water for later use (DeBusk and Hunt, 2014<ref>DeBusk, K. and Hunt, W. 2014. Rainwater harvesting: A comprehensive review of literature. 11-12-W. Water Resources Research Institute of the University of North Carolina.</ref>.]]


*[http://www.equatica.com.au/pdf/Knights%20et%20al%202012%20-%20rainwater%20tanks.pdf (Knights et al. 2012) - Can rainwater tanks meet multiple sustainability objectives?]
**This paper presents results of a study that highlight the benefits of rainwater tanks and harvesting systems in urban environments. The results come from real-time metering and usage of rainwater by a household that is a part of a rainwater tank program in Marrickville, Australia. 10 samples were taken from the tank and found that a mean level of 5 mg/L of TSS was found, while 0.054 mg/L was found for TP. The removal total for hte tank on an annual basis was found to be 240,000 mg/yr (TSS) and 2,000 mg/yr of TP (Knights et al. 2012<ref>Knights, D., Hanley, C. and McAuley, A. 2012. Can rainwater tanks meet multiple sustainability objectives? An assessment of water conservation, pollution reduction and frequent flows from rainwater tanks in Sydney. In Proc., 7th Int. Conf. on Water Sensitive Urban Designation (pp. 1-8)</ref>.
*[https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/handle/10453/18312 (Kus, et al. 2011) - Water Quality in Rainwater Tanks in Rural and Metropolitan Areas of New South Wales, Australia]
**This study compared RWH in Sydney and Kangaroo Valley, Australia and their ability to remove common pollutants found in rainwater collected from rooftops. TSS rates ranged predominately between 0.5 - 3.5 mg/L in most Sydney-area RWH tanks, but increased to +5.5 mg/L in others that were above local turbidity levels set by the Australian Guidelines for Water Recycling (AGWR). Meanwhile all samples taken from New South Wales based RWH never exceeded 1.0 mg/L. Additionally the authors conducted experiments on collected rainwater from a typical domestic roof in Sydney, New South Wales and treated it with an adsorption pretreatment filter media system of granular activated carbon (GAC), followed by micro-filtration. The influent rainwater was quite low already (1.2 mg/L), but the GAC pretreatment achieved an average reduction to 0.79 mg/L (~34% removal efficiency) removal efficiency and with the membrane filtration it reduced TSS to less than 0.5 mg/L (below instrument detection limits). therefore removal efficiency couldn't be accurately applied but greater than 58% (Kus, et al. 2011<ref>Kus, B.G., Kandasamy, J.K., Vigneswaran, S. and Shon, H. 2011. Water quality in rainwater tanks in rural and metropolitan areas of New South Wales, Australia. Journal of water Sustainability.</ref>).


==References==
==References==

Navigation menu