Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| <p>While few field studies of the pollutant removal capacity of bioswales are available from cold climate regions like Ontario, it can be assumed that they would perform similar to [[bioretention cells]]. Bioretention provides effective removal for many pollutants as a result of sedimentation, filtering, plant uptake, soil adsorption, and microbial processes. It is important to note that there is a relationship between the water balance and water quality functions. If a bioswale infiltrates and evaporates 100% of the flow from a site, then there is essentially no pollution leaving the site in surface runoff. Furthermore, treatment of infiltrated runoff will continue to occur as it moves through the native soils. </p>
| | While few field studies of the pollutant removal capacity of bioswales are available from cold climate regions like Ontario, it can be assumed that they would perform similar to [[bioretention cells]]. |
| <div class="col-md-8">
| | Bioretention provides effective removal for many pollutants as a result of sedimentation, filtering, plant uptake, soil adsorption, and microbial processes. It is important to note that there is a relationship between the water balance and water quality functions. |
| <table table class="table table-condensed table-striped">
| | If a bioswale infiltrates and evaporates 100% of the flow from a site, then there is essentially no pollution leaving the site in surface runoff. Furthermore, treatment of infiltrated runoff will continue to occur as it moves through the native soils. </p> |
| <tr class=success>
| | |
| <th class="text-center">Design</th>
| | {| class="orangetable" |
| <th class="text-center">Location</th>
| | |- |
| <th class="text-center">Runoff reduction</th>
| | !Design |
| </tr>
| | !Location |
| <tr>
| | !Runoff reduction |
| <td class="text-center">No underdrain</td>
| | |- |
| <td class="text-center">Washington</td>
| | |No underdrain||Washington||>98 % |
| <td class="text-center">98 %</td>
| | |- |
| </tr>
| | |No underdrain||United Kingdom||>94 % |
| <tr>
| | |- |
| <td class="text-center">No underdrain</td>
| | |With underdrain||Maryland||46 - 54 % |
| <td class="text-center">United Kingdom</td>
| | |- |
| <td class="text-center">94 %</td>
| | |colspan=2 <strong>Runoff reduction estimate</strong>||<strong>85 %</strong> |
| </tr>
| | |} |
| <tr>
| |
| <td class="text-center">With underdrain</td>
| |
| <td class="text-center">Maryland</td>
| |
| <td class="text-center">46 - 54 %</td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
| <tr>
| |
| <td colspan=2 class="text-right"><strong>Runoff reduction estimate</strong></td>
| |
| <td class="text-center"><strong>85 %</strong></td>
| |
| </tr>
| |
| </table>
| |
| </div>
| |
| <div class="col-md-12">
| |