Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
no edit summary
Line 26: Line 26:
|-
|-
|style="text-align:left;"|'''Pros'''
|style="text-align:left;"|'''Pros'''
*Robust
*Provides excellent water quality treatment
*Resistant to temporary hydraulic overload
*Can be beautiful
*Sludge removal infrequent
|style="text-align:left;"|'''Pros'''
|style="text-align:left;"|'''Pros'''
*Well established technology
*Well established technology
Line 46: Line 51:
*Will function prior to establishment of vegetation
*Will function prior to establishment of vegetation
|-
|-
|
|style="text-align:left;"|'''Cons'''
*Requires larger land area
*Sludge removal may be more difficult
*Open water may generate more health and safety concerns.
|style="text-align:left;"|'''Cons'''
|style="text-align:left;"|'''Cons'''
*Requires more land
*Requires more land
Line 53: Line 61:
*May be high cost
*May be high cost
*Sensitive to hydraulic overloading  
*Sensitive to hydraulic overloading  
|-
|Maintenance||Medium to high||Low
|-
|Stormwater benefit||High||Moderate
|-
|Biodiversity benefit||Increased with native planting||Typically lower
|}
|}


Navigation menu