8,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 50:
Line 50: Line 78:
Line 78: |*Represents depth of sump below underdrain or outflow pipe. In some cases, a flow control device was installed to slow outflow rates and enhance infiltration
Young, D., Van Seters, T., Graham, C. 2013 Evaluation of Underground Stormwater Infiltration Systems, TRCA, Toronto, OntarioVan Seters, T. and Young, D., 2015, Performance Comparison of Surface and Underground Stormwater Infiltration Practices, TRCA, Toronto, OntarioVan Seters T and Graham C, 2014, Performance Evaluation of a Bioretention System, TRCA, Toronto, OntarioSNAP studies of residential rain gardens (need to find reference)Van Seters, T. and Drake, J. Five year evaluation of Permeable Pavements, TRCA, Toronto, OntarioSTEP, Performance evaluation of Permeable Pavements – tech briefCalstone report – need to find referenceYoung D, Van Seters T, Graham, C, 2013, Evaluation of Residential Lot Level Stormwater Practices – tech briefSWAMP, 2005. Performance Assessment of a Perforated Pipe Stormwater Exfiltration system, Toronto, Ontario, TRCA, Toronto, OntarioSWAMP, 2002, Performance Assessment of a Swale Perforated Pipe Stormwater Infiltration System, TRCA, Toronto Ontario+ CVC stydies
no edit summary
!style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|Sump depth*
!style="background: darkcyan; color: white"|Sump depth*
|-
|-
|Infiltration trench||Two growing seasons||Silty clay||10:1||<10 cm; flow rate control||80%
|Infiltration trench<ref>Van Seters, T. and Young, D., 2015, Performance Comparison of Surface and Underground Stormwater Infiltration Practices, TRCA, Toronto, Ontario</ref>||Two growing seasons||Silty clay||10:1||<10 cm; flow rate control||80%
|-
|-
|Bioretention||Two growing seasons||Silty clay||10:1||<10 cm; flow rate control||90%
|Bioretention<ref>Van Seters, T. and Young, D., 2015, Performance Comparison of Surface and Underground Stormwater Infiltration Practices, TRCA, Toronto, Ontario</ref>||Two growing seasons||Silty clay||10:1||<10 cm; flow rate control||90%
|-
|-
|Permeable Pavement||Five growing seasons||Silty clay||1:1||<10 cm; flow rate control||45%
|Permeable Pavement<ref>Van Seters, T. and Drake, J. Five year evaluation of Permeable Pavements, TRCA, Toronto, Ontario</ref>||Five growing seasons||Silty clay||1:1||<10 cm; flow rate control||45%
|-
|-
|Bioretention||One growing season||Silty clay||10:1||<10 cm; flow rate control||83%
|Bioretention||One growing season||Silty clay||10:1||<10 cm; flow rate control||83%
|Permeable pavement||Four years||Silty clay fill over clay till||1:1||?||?
|Permeable pavement||Four years||Silty clay fill over clay till||1:1||?||?
|}
|}
<nowiki>*</nowiki>Represents depth of sump below underdrain or outflow pipe. In some cases, a flow control device was installed to slow outflow rates and enhance infiltration
2. Also known as the Etobicoke Exfiltration system
2. Also known as the Etobicoke Exfiltration system
==References==
References:
<references/>