Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:

{| class="wikitable" style="width: 175%; height: 200px;"
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; height: 200px;"
|-  
|-  
!colspan="2" style="background:white; color:black"| LID Practice
!colspan="2" style="background:white; color:black"| LID Practice
Line 6: Line 6:
!colspan="13" style="background: brown; color: white"|United States  
!colspan="13" style="background: brown; color: white"|United States  
|-
|-
!colspan="2" style="backgroung=green; color:white"|Bioretention|| CVC+TRCA (Factsheets-2010)<ref> http://www.creditvalleyca.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/lid-swm-guide-apdxa-bioretention.pdf</ref>|| CVC-Construction Guide-2012 <ref>http://www.creditvalleyca.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/CVC-LID-Construction-Guide-Book.pdf</ref>|| CVC-Retrofit Guide-2014<ref>http://www.creditvalleyca.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Grey-to-Green-Road-ROW-Retrofits-Complete_1.pdf</ref> || Toronto- 2016 || LID-SWM Guide 2010<ref> http://www.creditvalleyca.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/LID-SWM-Guide-v1.0_2010_1_no-appendices.pdf</ref>|| LID-Design Guide Edmonton- 2014<ref>https://www.edmonton.ca/city_government/documents/PDF/LIDGuide.pdf</ref> || New York State SWM Design Manual-2015 || Massachusets SW BMP-2013 || District of Columbia-SWM Guidebook-2010 || San Diego LID Handbook-2014 || Alabama LID Handbook-2013 || W. Virginia-SWM design guidance manual-2012 || Rhode Island-SW design & Installation Standards Manual-2012 || Pennsylvania-City of Philadelphia green St. design manual-2014 || Minnesota SW Manual-2017 || Tennessee-LID Development-SWM 2016 || Texas-LID Technical Guidance Manual-2013 || Oregon SWM Manual-2014 || Oregon State Univ. Fact Sheets-2011
!colspan="2" style="backgroung=green; color:white"height: 400px;|Bioretention|| CVC+TRCA (Factsheets-2010)<ref> http://www.creditvalleyca.ca/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/lid-swm-guide-apdxa-bioretention.pdf</ref>|| CVC-Construction Guide-2012 <ref>http://www.creditvalleyca.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/CVC-LID-Construction-Guide-Book.pdf</ref>|| CVC-Retrofit Guide-2014<ref>http://www.creditvalleyca.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Grey-to-Green-Road-ROW-Retrofits-Complete_1.pdf</ref> || Toronto- 2016 || LID <br>SWM <br>Guide <br>2010<ref> http://www.creditvalleyca.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/LID-SWM-Guide-v1.0_2010_1_no-appendices.pdf</ref>|| LID-Design Guide Edmonton- 2014<ref>https://www.edmonton.ca/city_government/documents/PDF/LIDGuide.pdf</ref> || New York State SWM Design Manual-2015 || Massachu-sets <br>SW BMP <br>2013 || District of Columbia-SWM Guidebook-2010 || San Diego LID Handbook-2014 || Alabama LID Handbook-2013 || W. Virginia-SWM design guidance manual-2012 || Rhode Island-SW design & Installation Standards Manual-2012 || Pennsylva-nia<br>Green St. <br>design manual <br>2014 || Minnesota SW Manual-2017 || Tennes-see <br>LID SWM <br>2016 || Texas-LID Technical Guidance Manual-2013 || Oregon SWM Manual-2014 || Oregon State Univ. Fact Sheets-2011
|-
|-
|colspan="2" style="background:whit; color:red; text-align: center"| '''Filter media depth (m)'''  
|colspan="2" style="background:whit; color:red; text-align: center"| '''Filter media depth (m)'''  
Line 28: Line 28:
|  || Soluble salts ||  ||  ||  || < 2.0 mmhos/cm ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  
|  || Soluble salts ||  ||  ||  || < 2.0 mmhos/cm ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  
|-
|-
|  || Cationic exchange capacity || > 10 meq/100 g || 10 meq/100 g || > 10 meq/100 g || > 10 meq/100 g || > 10 meq/100 g || > 5 meq/100 g ||  ||  || > 10 || > 5 ||  || > 10 ||  ||  ||  || > 10 ||  ||  || > 5
|  || Cationic exchange capacity<br>(meq/100g)|| > 10 || 10 || > 10 || > 10 || > 10 || > 5 ||  ||  || > 10 || > 5 ||  || > 10 ||  ||  ||  || > 10 ||  ||  || > 5
|-
|-
|  || pH || 5.5-7.5 || 5.5-7.5 || 5.5-7.5 || 5.5-7.5 || 5.5-7.5 || 5.5-7.5 ||  ||  ||  || 6-8 ||  ||  ||  || 6-7 || 6-8.5 (WQ blend) ||  || 6-8 ||  || 5.5-7.5
|  || pH || 5.5-7.5 || 5.5-7.5 || 5.5-7.5 || 5.5-7.5 || 5.5-7.5 || 5.5-7.5 ||  ||  ||  || 6-8 ||  ||  ||  || 6-7 || 6-8.5 (WQ blend) ||  || 6-8 ||  || 5.5-7.5
Line 54: Line 54:
||| Diameter(clear stone) ||  50 mm ||  ||  ||  50 mm ||  50 mm ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  
||| Diameter(clear stone) ||  50 mm ||  ||  ||  50 mm ||  50 mm ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  
|-
|-
|'''Pea Gravel Choking Layer''' ||depth (mm) || 100 ||  ||  ||  || 100 || 100 ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  
|Pea Gravel Choking Layer ||depth (mm) || 100 ||  ||  ||  || 100 || 100 ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  
|-
|-
||| diameter (mm) || 3-10 ||  ||  ||  || 3-10 ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  
||| diameter (mm) || 3-10 ||  ||  ||  || 3-10 ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  
Line 72: Line 72:
|colspan="2" style="background:whit; color:red; text-align: center"| '''Underdrain'''  
|colspan="2" style="background:whit; color:red; text-align: center"| '''Underdrain'''  
|-
|-
||| Required when infiltration rate  || < 15 mm/hr ||  ||  || < 15 mm/hr ||  || < 13 mm/hr ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  
||| Required when infiltration rate<br> (mm/hr) || < 15 ||  ||  || < 15 ||  || < 13 ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  
|-
|-
| ||Diameter || min. 100 mm(200 mm recommended) || min. 100 mm, 200 mm is recommended ||  || min. 200 mm || min. 100 mm(200 mm recommended) || 200 mm ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  || 4 inches ||  ||  ||  ||  
| ||Diameter<br>(mm) || min. 100<br>(200 recd.) || min. 100<br> (200 recd.) ||  || min. 200 || min. 100<br>(200 mm recd.) || 200 mm ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  || 4 inches ||  ||  ||  ||  
|-
|-
| ||Depth above the gravel storage layer || 100 mm ||  ||  || 100 mm ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  
| ||Depth above the gravel storage layer || 100 mm ||  ||  || 100 mm ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  
Line 90: Line 90:
|colspan="2" style="background:whit; color:red; text-align: center"| '''Setback from building Foundation(m)''' || 4 ||  ||  || 4 || 4 || 3 (clay), 5 (heavy clay) ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  || see table 3 below ||  ||  ||  ||  
|colspan="2" style="background:whit; color:red; text-align: center"| '''Setback from building Foundation(m)''' || 4 ||  ||  || 4 || 4 || 3 (clay), 5 (heavy clay) ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  || see table 3 below ||  ||  ||  ||  
|-
|-
|colspan="2" style="background:whit; color:red; text-align: center"|  '''(Impervious drainage/treatment facility) area''' || 5:1 to 15:1 ||  ||  || 5:1 to 15:1 || 5:1 to 15:1 ||  || < 5:1 loading ratio (DA to IA, DA 100% IP) || SA of BR 3 to 6% of CDA ||  ||  || sized at 5-8 % of IPCDA || BR SA 3-6% of CDA ||  ||  || CDA < 5 acres || CDA < 2.5 acres || CDA < 5 acres ||  || BR SA: 6-15 % of IP area
|colspan="2" style="background:whit; color:red; text-align: center"|  '''(Impervious drainage/treatment facility) area''' || 5:1 to 15:1 ||  ||  || 5:1 to 15:1 || 5:1 to 15:1 ||  || < 5:1 loading ratio (DA to IA, DA 100% IP) || SA of BR <br>3-6% of<br> CDA ||  ||  || sized at 5-8 % of IPCDA || BR SA 3-6% of CDA ||  ||  || CDA < 5 acres || CDA < 2.5 acres || CDA < 5 acres ||  || BR SA: 6-15 % of IP area
|-
|-
|colspan="2" style="background:whit; color:red; text-align: center"|  '''Contributing Slope (%)''' || 1-5 ||  ||  ||  || 1-5 ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  || >1 % and < 33% ||  ||  ||  ||  
|colspan="2" style="background:whit; color:red; text-align: center"|  '''Contributing Slope (%)''' || 1-5 ||  ||  ||  || 1-5 ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||  || >1 % and < 33% ||  ||  ||  ||  

Navigation menu