Line 51: |
Line 51: |
| !Sump depth (m)* | | !Sump depth (m)* |
| |- | | |- |
| |Infiltration trench<ref name = "VS 2015"> Van Seters, T. and Young, D., 2015, Performance Comparison of Surface and Underground Stormwater Infiltration Practices, TRCA, Toronto, Ontario"</ref>||2 growing seasons||Silty clay||10:1||0.1; flow rate control||80 | | |Infiltration trench<ref name = "VS 2015"> Van Seters, T. and Young, D., 2015, Performance Comparison of Surface and Underground Stormwater Infiltration Practices, TRCA, Toronto, Ontario</ref>||2 growing seasons||Silty clay||10:1||0.1; flow rate control||80 |
| |- | | |- |
| |Bioretention<ref name = "VS 2015"></ref>||2 growing seasons||Silty clay||10:1||0.1; flow rate control||90 | | |Bioretention<ref name = "VS 2015"></ref>||2 growing seasons||Silty clay||10:1||0.1; flow rate control||90 |
Line 63: |
Line 63: |
| |Infiltration chamber<ref name = "DY 2013">Young D, Van Seters T, Graham, C, 2013, Evaluation of Residential Lot Level Stormwater Practices – tech brief</ref>||2 years||Sandy silt||20:1||1.2 (approx.)||90 | | |Infiltration chamber<ref name = "DY 2013">Young D, Van Seters T, Graham, C, 2013, Evaluation of Residential Lot Level Stormwater Practices – tech brief</ref>||2 years||Sandy silt||20:1||1.2 (approx.)||90 |
| |- | | |- |
| |Infiltration trench<ref name = "DY 2013"></ref>||2 years||Clayey silt||64:1||2||36 | | |Infiltration trench<ref name = "DY 2013"/>||2 years||Clayey silt||64:1||2||36 |
| |- | | |- |
| |Infiltration trench<ref name = "DY 2013"></ref>||2 years||Clayey silt||155:1||2||16 | | |Infiltration trench<ref name = "DY 2013"/>||2 years||Clayey silt||155:1||2||16 |
| |- | | |- |
| |Exfiltration trench<ref>SWAMP, 2005. Performance Assessment of a Perforated Pipe Stormwater Exfiltration system, Toronto, Ontario, TRCA, Toronto, Ontario</ref>||2 years||Clay to clay silt till over silty sand till||7:1 (approx.)||0.65||>90 | | |Exfiltration trench<ref>SWAMP, 2005. Performance Assessment of a Perforated Pipe Stormwater Exfiltration system, Toronto, Ontario, TRCA, Toronto, Ontario</ref>||2 years||Clay to clay silt till over silty sand till||7:1 (approx.)||0.65||>90 |
Line 75: |
Line 75: |
| |Bioretention<ref>Credit Valley Conservation, 2016, Lakeview Low Impact Development Infrastructure Performance and Risk Assessment Technical Report, Mississauga Ontario</ref>||3 years||Silty clay||10:1 (approx.)||0.02||92 | | |Bioretention<ref>Credit Valley Conservation, 2016, Lakeview Low Impact Development Infrastructure Performance and Risk Assessment Technical Report, Mississauga Ontario</ref>||3 years||Silty clay||10:1 (approx.)||0.02||92 |
| |- | | |- |
| |Bioretention<ref>Credit Valley Conservation, 2016, IMAX Low Impact Development Infrastructure Performance and Risk Assessment Technical Report, Mississauga Ontario</ref>||3 years||Silty clay fill over clay till||30:1||0.025||72 | | |Bioretention<ref name = "IMAX">Credit Valley Conservation, 2016, IMAX Low Impact Development Infrastructure Performance and Risk Assessment Technical Report, Mississauga Ontario</ref>||3 years||Silty clay fill over clay till||30:1||0.025||72 |
| |- | | |- |
| |Permeable pavement<ref>Credit Valley Conservation, 2016, IMAX Low Impact Development Infrastructure Performance and Risk Assessment Technical Report, Mississauga Ontario</ref>||3 years||Silty clay fill over clay till||1:1||0.025||49 | | |Permeable pavement<ref name = "IMAX"/>||3 years||Silty clay fill over clay till||1:1||0.025||49 |
| |} | | |} |
| <nowiki>*</nowiki>Represents depth of sump below underdrain or outflow pipe. In some cases, a flow control device was installed to slow outflow rates and enhance infiltration | | <nowiki>*</nowiki>Represents depth of sump below underdrain or outflow pipe. In some cases, a flow control device was installed to slow outflow rates and enhance infiltration |